Beats by Dr. Dre quick look

scaled.IMG 3747

Monster Cable, the makers of cable, just sent the new Beats by Dr. Dre, a pair of noise cancelling “studio” headphones aimed at the mid-range audio consumer. At $349, these are priced at exactly the same point as the Bose QuietComfort 3, these headphones closest competitor. I’ve been wearing them for the past hour and found them on par with the QC3s in terms of noise reduction. They have very crisp tight bass and a nice separation as well.

Best of all the, the Beats use AAA batteries instead of the QC3’s battery pack, which means you’re not stuck if you forget to recharge. I’ll be taking a flight tomorrow and I’ll bring these along to test - I’m just about sold on the QC3s when it comes to noise reduction but I’m game to try these out in a real-world scenario.

The ear cups are quite nice and isolate the ear well and the styling is slightly younger and cooler than other massive headphones out there. Monster is entering a wireless age and they have to excel at stuff that doesn’t get electrons from point A to point B just to survive. In my brief testing, I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on these.

scaled.IMG 3750scaled.IMG 3752scaled.IMG 3751scaled.IMG 3753scaled.IMG 3754

  •   

10 Comments/Pingbacks so far

 
no image
Pfepher (Who am I?)

eh. At $349 they are over priced, just like most other Monster products. I wonder if now that Monster has a product with “Dr.” in the name if they are going to start suing real doctors.

 
no image
bpm2000 (Who am I?)

anything + monster = fail. Srsly, fuck Monster, even if the product IS good.

 
no image
scannermobs (Who am I?)

this will probably sell very well. sad indeed that such a blatantly target-marketed product will be bought by people that probably wont understand the benefit. as i understand it, the guy that started monster did so with the best intentions, its just the partenrship with apple that drives me mad!!! (they really push these things upon anyone buying an ipod, including my 61-year old father, who understood the rip-off, but was pestered and told he ‘wouldnt enjoy the full benefit of the ipod’ etc unless he had a monster interconnect. which is pretty cheap tactics imo.

one more thing, i think ‘tight’ bass would be a more commonly-recognised term, rather than ‘crisp’. crisp is onomatopoeic and usually refers to high frequency performance.

 
no image
Devin Coldewey (Who am I?)

Interesting interpretation of crisp, but…. objection!!!
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-crisp.html
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crisp
I wish you were right, though… if only because you use the word onomatopoeic.

 
no image
scannermobs (Who am I?)

Crisp: “lively; pithy; sparkling; brisk; sharp; clear”

Surely these words would also be used to describe higher-frequency characteristics? I don’t understand how these definitions of crisp prove my point wrong?

Obviously the majority of describing music/sound is subjective, we can make clear distinctions that are a matter of fact (e.g. the recording is too bass-heavy), or we can use more subjective descriptions (e.g. the mids are thick, the top-end is too brittle). I would say the most common words to describe bass are: boomy, boxy, tight, thick, heavy, rich, etc. And not to say that people aren’t allowed to use their own subjective words of course, it’s just to me it kind of tied in with the misinformed marketing strategy that I think people have experienced with this company.

 
no image
Devin Coldewey (Who am I?)

Oh, I just meant regarding the etymology of the word (old english, not onomatopoeic) . You’re absolutely right on the word choice.

 
no image
scannermobs (Who am I?)

Ah I see, my mistake! Wasn’t so much meaning the origin as the use, but thanks for pointing that out!

So the crisp (English potato chip) really is superiorally-named then: “clean-cut, crinkled, wrinkled, firm curls”

 
no image
bpm2000 (Who am I?)

early impression:
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/4511971-post70.html

jude knows what hes talkin bout most of the time… seems like a confusion of marketing and audio signature.

(dr.dre+monster… balanced sound? $349? active noise cancelling? who exactly are they marketing this to?)

 
no image
elle (Who am I?)

“dr.dre+monster… balanced sound? $349? active noise cancelling? who exactly are they marketing this to?”

Rappers.

 
no image
Raj (Who am I?)

Over the QC3s? I certainly hope so as those HPs are a more of a huge marketing scam. The Sen HD280s still rock that market and sell for half the price. *cough cough* You should add an audio writer to the staff.

Trackbacks/Pings

Leave a Comment

« Back to text comment

Comment template by SezWho

CrunchGear Sponsors