<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beats by Dr. Dre quick look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:10:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: elle</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-783377</link>
		<dc:creator>elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-783377</guid>
		<description>&quot;dr.dre+monster… balanced sound? $349? active noise cancelling? who exactly are they marketing this to?&quot;

Rappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dr.dre+monster… balanced sound? $349? active noise cancelling? who exactly are they marketing this to?&#8221;</p>
<p>Rappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-778428</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-778428</guid>
		<description>Over the QC3s? I certainly hope so as those HPs are a more of a huge marketing scam. The Sen HD280s still rock that market and sell for half the price. *cough cough* You should add an audio writer to the staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the QC3s? I certainly hope so as those HPs are a more of a huge marketing scam. The Sen HD280s still rock that market and sell for half the price. *cough cough* You should add an audio writer to the staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpm2000</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-778183</link>
		<dc:creator>bpm2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-778183</guid>
		<description>early impression:
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/4511971-post70.html

jude knows what hes talkin bout most of the time... seems like a confusion of marketing and audio signature.

(dr.dre+monster... balanced sound?  $349?  active noise cancelling?  who exactly are they marketing this to?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>early impression:<br />
<a href="http://www.head-fi.org/forums/4511971-post70.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.head-fi.org/forums/4511971-post70.html</a></p>
<p>jude knows what hes talkin bout most of the time&#8230; seems like a confusion of marketing and audio signature.</p>
<p>(dr.dre+monster&#8230; balanced sound?  $349?  active noise cancelling?  who exactly are they marketing this to?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scannermobs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777942</link>
		<dc:creator>scannermobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777942</guid>
		<description>Ah I see, my mistake! Wasn&#039;t so much meaning the origin as the use, but thanks for pointing that out!

So the crisp (English potato chip) really is superiorally-named then: &quot;clean-cut, crinkled, wrinkled, firm curls&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I see, my mistake! Wasn&#8217;t so much meaning the origin as the use, but thanks for pointing that out!</p>
<p>So the crisp (English potato chip) really is superiorally-named then: &#8220;clean-cut, crinkled, wrinkled, firm curls&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777934</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777934</guid>
		<description>Oh, I just meant regarding the etymology of the word (old english, not onomatopoeic) . You&#039;re absolutely right on the word choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I just meant regarding the etymology of the word (old english, not onomatopoeic) . You&#8217;re absolutely right on the word choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scannermobs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777908</link>
		<dc:creator>scannermobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777908</guid>
		<description>Crisp: &quot;lively; pithy; sparkling; brisk; sharp; clear&quot;

Surely these words would also be used to describe higher-frequency characteristics? I don&#039;t understand how these definitions of crisp prove my point wrong?

Obviously the majority of describing music/sound is subjective, we can make clear distinctions that are a matter of fact (e.g. the recording is too bass-heavy), or we can use more subjective descriptions (e.g. the mids are thick, the top-end is too brittle). I would say the most common words to describe bass are: boomy, boxy, tight, thick, heavy, rich, etc. And not to say that people aren&#039;t allowed to use their own subjective words of course, it&#039;s just to me it kind of tied in with the misinformed marketing strategy that I think people have experienced with this company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crisp: &#8220;lively; pithy; sparkling; brisk; sharp; clear&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely these words would also be used to describe higher-frequency characteristics? I don&#8217;t understand how these definitions of crisp prove my point wrong?</p>
<p>Obviously the majority of describing music/sound is subjective, we can make clear distinctions that are a matter of fact (e.g. the recording is too bass-heavy), or we can use more subjective descriptions (e.g. the mids are thick, the top-end is too brittle). I would say the most common words to describe bass are: boomy, boxy, tight, thick, heavy, rich, etc. And not to say that people aren&#8217;t allowed to use their own subjective words of course, it&#8217;s just to me it kind of tied in with the misinformed marketing strategy that I think people have experienced with this company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777878</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777878</guid>
		<description>Interesting interpretation of crisp, but.... objection!!!
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-crisp.html
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crisp
I wish you were right, though... if only because you use the word onomatopoeic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting interpretation of crisp, but&#8230;. objection!!!<br />
<a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-crisp.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O27-crisp.html</a><br />
<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crisp" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/crisp</a><br />
I wish you were right, though&#8230; if only because you use the word onomatopoeic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scannermobs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777806</link>
		<dc:creator>scannermobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777806</guid>
		<description>this will probably sell very well. sad indeed that such a blatantly target-marketed product will be bought by people that probably wont understand the benefit. as i understand it, the guy that started monster did so with the best intentions, its just the partenrship with apple that drives me mad!!! (they really push these things upon anyone buying an ipod, including my 61-year old father, who understood the rip-off, but was pestered and told he &#039;wouldnt enjoy the full benefit of the ipod&#039; etc unless he had a monster interconnect. which is pretty cheap tactics imo.

one more thing, i think &#039;tight&#039; bass would be a more commonly-recognised term, rather than &#039;crisp&#039;. crisp is onomatopoeic and usually refers to high frequency performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this will probably sell very well. sad indeed that such a blatantly target-marketed product will be bought by people that probably wont understand the benefit. as i understand it, the guy that started monster did so with the best intentions, its just the partenrship with apple that drives me mad!!! (they really push these things upon anyone buying an ipod, including my 61-year old father, who understood the rip-off, but was pestered and told he &#8216;wouldnt enjoy the full benefit of the ipod&#8217; etc unless he had a monster interconnect. which is pretty cheap tactics imo.</p>
<p>one more thing, i think &#8216;tight&#8217; bass would be a more commonly-recognised term, rather than &#8216;crisp&#8217;. crisp is onomatopoeic and usually refers to high frequency performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpm2000</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777791</link>
		<dc:creator>bpm2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777791</guid>
		<description>anything + monster = fail.  Srsly, fuck Monster, even if the product IS good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anything + monster = fail.  Srsly, fuck Monster, even if the product IS good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pfepher</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/23/beats-by-dr-dre-quick-look/comment-page-1/#comment-777789</link>
		<dc:creator>Pfepher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30746#comment-777789</guid>
		<description>eh.  At $349 they are over priced, just like most other Monster products.  I wonder if now that Monster has a product with &quot;Dr.&quot; in the name if they are going to start suing real doctors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh.  At $349 they are over priced, just like most other Monster products.  I wonder if now that Monster has a product with &#8220;Dr.&#8221; in the name if they are going to start suing real doctors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
