Comments on: Utah researchers suggest OLED efficiency not so hot http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/17/utah-researchers-suggest-oled-efficiency-not-so-hot/ Gadgets, gear and computer hardware. Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:53:09 -0500 hourly 1 By: whatdontyouget http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/17/utah-researchers-suggest-oled-efficiency-not-so-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-843559 whatdontyouget Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:12:31 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=35033#comment-843559 I actually don't like making spelling errors, but pointing them out just serves to take us off-topic. The article is just bad. Pretty much everything the original author said was wrong, or not at all based on research (let alone science). Even when J. Levine spelled it out, the author tried to assume the 25% number was meaningful. If you follow the link in the comment, you will find that OLED's are ALREADY mass produced by Samsung SDI. Additionally, other companies have started to ramp up their production and/or have plans to do so in the future. These products do contain some fluorescent materials because the lifetimes of the phosphorescent materials are not long enough yet for some applications. However the products also contain phosphorescent materials and will likely be all phosphorescent in the future. Specifically, the products do not use phosphorescent blue, may or may not use green, and likely use red. one more link www.universaldisplay.com also see http://www.oled-info.com/ I actually don’t like making spelling errors, but pointing them out just serves to take us off-topic.

The article is just bad. Pretty much everything the original author said was wrong, or not at all based on research (let alone science). Even when J. Levine spelled it out, the author tried to assume the 25% number was meaningful.

If you follow the link in the comment, you will find that OLED’s are ALREADY mass produced by Samsung SDI. Additionally, other companies have started to ramp up their production and/or have plans to do so in the future. These products do contain some fluorescent materials because the lifetimes of the phosphorescent materials are not long enough yet for some applications. However the products also contain phosphorescent materials and will likely be all phosphorescent in the future. Specifically, the products do not use phosphorescent blue, may or may not use green, and likely use red.
one more link
http://www.universaldisplay.com
also see
http://www.oled-info.com/

]]> By: Devin Coldewey http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/17/utah-researchers-suggest-oled-efficiency-not-so-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-826347 Devin Coldewey Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:06:53 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=35033#comment-826347 So much venom! But I still don't see what "you're" problem is with the post... So much venom!
But I still don’t see what “you’re” problem is with the post…

]]> By: givemeabreak http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/17/utah-researchers-suggest-oled-efficiency-not-so-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-825557 givemeabreak Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:12:13 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=35033#comment-825557 It's kind of cute when someone pretends to know something for which they have no clue. Then they print it and start to believe it themselves. "perhaps (snip) fluorescent OLEDs have become the default" NO. "Certainly Mr. Levine is correct, but I think that the U of U study was using the most readily available or cheapest types of OLEDs" WHY? "which are almost certainly what would be used by the industry if put into true mass production." IT ISN'T "Thanks for keeping us honest." YOUR STILL NOT Do a little research (you have done none so far) and try to be honest from the start. To help you a little, which you should be able to do yourself, see: http://www.cdrinfo.com/sections/news/Details.aspx?NewsId=23619 It’s kind of cute when someone pretends to know something for which they have no clue. Then they print it and start to believe it themselves.
“perhaps (snip) fluorescent OLEDs have become the default”
NO.
“Certainly Mr. Levine is correct, but I think that the U of U study was using the most readily available or cheapest types of OLEDs”
WHY?
“which are almost certainly what would be used by the industry if put into true mass production.”
IT ISN’T
“Thanks for keeping us honest.”
YOUR STILL NOT
Do a little research (you have done none so far) and try to be honest from the start.

To help you a little, which you should be able to do yourself, see:
http://www.cdrinfo.com/sections/news/Details.aspx?NewsId=23619

]]>