RED files infringement lawsuit against LG for “Scarlet” usage
- August 18th, 2008
- 4 Comments

When I heard about LG’s “Scarlet” line of HDTVs and its misleading ad campaign, the first thing I thought of was the real Scarlet and then “Is RED going to sue these mothers or what?” And so, four months later, they have. A post at the RED forums by Jim Jannard reveals that the legal gears are turning in Orange County and they’re going to be doing a little more cracking down from now on.
Now in this day and age when people sue one another over spilled drinks, one might legitimately ask whether they have reason to do this. Well, I certainly think they do; if LG were putting out a “Scarlet” mp3 player or something I’d say no, but a product for viewing HD video? RED’s already in that game and they’ve already got a product announced. And as it turns out, LG asked RED for permission, and RED said “no.” And yet, here we are. The scoundrels! [thanks for the tip, REDmaster Mike]







tim (Who am I?)
3 months ago
hmmm. i can buy a scarlet tv right now from amazon. where’s the link to buy that camera? how long until it comes out?
lg should be suing red.
Reply
Devin Coldewey (Who am I?)
3 months ago
I’m afraid it doesn’t work like that
Reply
Chris Taylor Jr (Who am I?)
3 months ago
Sadly it should not work either way. I see no reason they can not both use the name scarlet as long as its not both for camera’s
Reply
John Dawson (Who am I?)
3 months ago
It seem ridiculous to me that anyone can claim exclusive rights to commonly used words as names for their products.
I applaud Jim Jannard’s revolutionary products and I shall probably buy one of them. But if he brands them with names like Red and Scarlet to tweak the Panavisions of this world then he should expect a tweak or two in return.
Go for it LG.
PS: Here’s a thought; maybe I should sue all the hundreds of thousands of John Dawsons born and named after me.