Comments on: Call of Duty: World at War gameplay footage

By: alex

alex — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:39:33 +0000

Ya this game looks sick and its and WWII is way better than modern war.

By: NYKILLJOY

NYKILLJOY — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:37:54 +0000

Speaking from a CoD4 gaming clan point of view… We can’t wait…We love the new weapons and can’t wait to use them..WWII as far as we are concern there is no better war…
CoD5 should be allot of fun…

By: blah

blah — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:08:24 +0000

looks sick as fuck !!!!

By: Elliott

Elliott — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:05:16 +0000

I hear a lot of people talking about “a step back” the only other wars that they could have done is either Vietnam (bad idea),WWI (trench warfare ftl), Korea, or god forbid, the Civil War. And before you let loose and cry THEY COULDVE DONE FUTURE WAR. No. I’m equally tired of future war games (Battlefield: 2142, Frontlines: Fuel of War, Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfigter 1 and 2) So I’m glad to see them return to the genre that put them on the map, to tell a different story than they told before. Let’s just hope this one doesn’t lose online playability after about 4 months and 2 re-ranks lol.

By: Riles

Riles — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:19:56 +0000

While I have to agree the return to WWII feels like a step backwards I have to place my faith in Treyarch who have been responsible for at least 80% of all gaming I have done since the release of Call of Duty 2.