<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 50D DSLR shows up on Canon Japan site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/24/canon-50d-dslr-shows-up-on-canon-japan-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/24/canon-50d-dslr-shows-up-on-canon-japan-site/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:29:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/24/canon-50d-dslr-shows-up-on-canon-japan-site/comment-page-1/#comment-843544</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=36597#comment-843544</guid>
		<description>Except it is not an official Canon page, probably a webdesign outfit working for Canon, or a hoax. Not a server owned by Canon. Anyway, let&#039;s see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except it is not an official Canon page, probably a webdesign outfit working for Canon, or a hoax. Not a server owned by Canon. Anyway, let&#8217;s see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Silliphant</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/08/24/canon-50d-dslr-shows-up-on-canon-japan-site/comment-page-1/#comment-842994</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Silliphant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=36597#comment-842994</guid>
		<description>I am greatly concerned about the slow continuous burst rate. It is slightly slower than the 40D. This shows that they intend to restrict fast sports coverage to the more expensive models. I will have to take a close look at Nikon, and sell off my 3 Canons. Canon, has lost me, by dropping the ball on what seemed
a valuable increasing speed trend. I was able to shoot 625 frames on a burst at 700K, with the 40D. Their 15.1 megapixel sensor
screwed the ability to shoot fast for long periods. (100 second bursts) I use Nikon prime lenses on my 3 CMOS Sony HD video Z7u, so I guess I&#039;ll have to start thinking Nikon for stills and burst coverage. They could have provided a smaller file size for those who need multiple frames rather than this overkill single frame size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am greatly concerned about the slow continuous burst rate. It is slightly slower than the 40D. This shows that they intend to restrict fast sports coverage to the more expensive models. I will have to take a close look at Nikon, and sell off my 3 Canons. Canon, has lost me, by dropping the ball on what seemed<br />
a valuable increasing speed trend. I was able to shoot 625 frames on a burst at 700K, with the 40D. Their 15.1 megapixel sensor<br />
screwed the ability to shoot fast for long periods. (100 second bursts) I use Nikon prime lenses on my 3 CMOS Sony HD video Z7u, so I guess I&#8217;ll have to start thinking Nikon for stills and burst coverage. They could have provided a smaller file size for those who need multiple frames rather than this overkill single frame size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
