<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bandwidth caps don&#8217;t concern some video providers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:22:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jedipunk</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-882417</link>
		<dc:creator>jedipunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/#comment-882417</guid>
		<description>Wildblue (the best Sat ISP) already has caps of 7.5GB/30 days which is generous and generously measured compared to HughesNet that has a similar cap but is measured hourly (or daily, not sure)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wildblue (the best Sat ISP) already has caps of 7.5GB/30 days which is generous and generously measured compared to HughesNet that has a similar cap but is measured hourly (or daily, not sure)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zerock</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-880183</link>
		<dc:creator>zerock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/#comment-880183</guid>
		<description>they obviously just want to kill competition from succesful streaming services in fear they will be replaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they obviously just want to kill competition from succesful streaming services in fear they will be replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jabs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/comment-page-1/#comment-879419</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/08/bandwidth-caps-dont-concern-some-video-providers/#comment-879419</guid>
		<description>All I know is that Comcast had better be giving me some sort of an idea as to how much bandwidth I&#039;m using each month.  I can forsee myself and roommates easily going over 250Gb a month through online video (hulu and such) as well as torrent files.  I am constantly torrenting and I know that I&#039;ve gone well beyond 25 to 30Gb in a single day.  Either way, for how much we&#039;re paying for internet access, it&#039;s pretty f&#039;in ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I know is that Comcast had better be giving me some sort of an idea as to how much bandwidth I&#8217;m using each month.  I can forsee myself and roommates easily going over 250Gb a month through online video (hulu and such) as well as torrent files.  I am constantly torrenting and I know that I&#8217;ve gone well beyond 25 to 30Gb in a single day.  Either way, for how much we&#8217;re paying for internet access, it&#8217;s pretty f&#8217;in ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
