<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FitBit, a tiny fitness gadget that I actually want</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/09/fitbit-a-tiny-fitness-gadget-that-i-actually-want/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/09/fitbit-a-tiny-fitness-gadget-that-i-actually-want/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/09/fitbit-a-tiny-fitness-gadget-that-i-actually-want/comment-page-1/#comment-971249</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=40825#comment-971249</guid>
		<description>John, I definitely agree the FitBit is a really cool and useful product, but I think a major drawback relates to the accuracy of calculating total energy expenditure.  The device cannot properly calculate calories burned during strength training for example because it&#039;s solely based on using an accelerometer.  The Bodybugg appears to be a better, more sophisticated product, but it&#039;s a lot more expensive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I definitely agree the FitBit is a really cool and useful product, but I think a major drawback relates to the accuracy of calculating total energy expenditure.  The device cannot properly calculate calories burned during strength training for example because it&#8217;s solely based on using an accelerometer.  The Bodybugg appears to be a better, more sophisticated product, but it&#8217;s a lot more expensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
