<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada banning fees for text messages! Well, not quite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/25/canada-banning-fees-for-text-messages-well-not-quite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/25/canada-banning-fees-for-text-messages-well-not-quite/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:06:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canada banning fees for text messages! Well, not quite &#124; tech gadget update</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/25/canada-banning-fees-for-text-messages-well-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-924814</link>
		<dc:creator>Canada banning fees for text messages! Well, not quite &#124; tech gadget update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=44606#comment-924814</guid>
		<description>[...] Via [crunchgear] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via [crunchgear] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/25/canada-banning-fees-for-text-messages-well-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-924151</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=44606#comment-924151</guid>
		<description>Hopefully the law will be adapted from its original purpose. Cell phone spam is hardly a major problem, but maybe someone will use the provisions of this bill (if it passes) to do something real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the law will be adapted from its original purpose. Cell phone spam is hardly a major problem, but maybe someone will use the provisions of this bill (if it passes) to do something real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andfre</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/25/canada-banning-fees-for-text-messages-well-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-924134</link>
		<dc:creator>Andfre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=44606#comment-924134</guid>
		<description>This was the first I&#039;ve heard of this, but it sounds great - I have a plan with TELUS.  The thing is, it&#039;s true there is not much cell phone spam here in Canada, although I did get the first spam just 2 days ago and I&#039;ve had the number since last Dec.  The thing is, we have our federal election in a few short weeks, and may have another minority government, in which case I would not be surprised if the bill wouldn&#039;t pass, as the opposition parties will vote against it because, well, just because that&#039;s what they think they have to do as The Opposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the first I&#8217;ve heard of this, but it sounds great &#8211; I have a plan with TELUS.  The thing is, it&#8217;s true there is not much cell phone spam here in Canada, although I did get the first spam just 2 days ago and I&#8217;ve had the number since last Dec.  The thing is, we have our federal election in a few short weeks, and may have another minority government, in which case I would not be surprised if the bill wouldn&#8217;t pass, as the opposition parties will vote against it because, well, just because that&#8217;s what they think they have to do as The Opposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
