<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic Lumix G1 performance specs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/03/panasonic-lumix-g1-performance-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/03/panasonic-lumix-g1-performance-specs/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:41:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Panasonic&#8217;s micro four thirds Lumix G1 gets reviewed</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/03/panasonic-lumix-g1-performance-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-972027</link>
		<dc:creator>Panasonic&#8217;s micro four thirds Lumix G1 gets reviewed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=46333#comment-972027</guid>
		<description>[...] of un-SLR is up over at DPReview, and they&#8217;ve given it the usual treatment. It looks like the G1, which I was a bit skeptical of, comes through okay. Given its natural limitations, it succeeds in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of un-SLR is up over at DPReview, and they&#8217;ve given it the usual treatment. It looks like the G1, which I was a bit skeptical of, comes through okay. Given its natural limitations, it succeeds in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
