<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush doctrine for piracy: More laws! And a czar!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/bush-doctrine-for-piracy-more-laws-and-a-czar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/bush-doctrine-for-piracy-more-laws-and-a-czar/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:30:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt M.</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/bush-doctrine-for-piracy-more-laws-and-a-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-938324</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=48001#comment-938324</guid>
		<description>Yep, the congressional democrats (who control both houses) have no responsibility for this.

Also, citing Ars Technica&#039;s article http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080926-ip-bill-passes-senate-no-civil-enforcement-power-for-doj.html - 
&quot;The Bush administration had also objected to a provision that remains in the bill, creating an IP &quot;czar&quot; within the White House to coordinate IP enforcement efforts.&quot;

Here is the press release by Sen Leahy (D-Vt) http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200809/092608b.html notice all the sponsors and co-sponsors names.  

Also, you can tell which of your Representatives voted which way at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-664 and Senators passed it by Unanimous Consent on Sep 26, 2008.

No one associated with this bill should get a free pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the congressional democrats (who control both houses) have no responsibility for this.</p>
<p>Also, citing Ars Technica&#8217;s article <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080926-ip-bill-passes-senate-no-civil-enforcement-power-for-doj.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080926-ip-bill-passes-senate-no-civil-enforcement-power-for-doj.html</a> &#8211;<br />
&#8220;The Bush administration had also objected to a provision that remains in the bill, creating an IP &#8220;czar&#8221; within the White House to coordinate IP enforcement efforts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is the press release by Sen Leahy (D-Vt) <a href="http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200809/092608b.html" rel="nofollow">http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200809/092608b.html</a> notice all the sponsors and co-sponsors names.  </p>
<p>Also, you can tell which of your Representatives voted which way at <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-664" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-664</a> and Senators passed it by Unanimous Consent on Sep 26, 2008.</p>
<p>No one associated with this bill should get a free pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirPotentia</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/bush-doctrine-for-piracy-more-laws-and-a-czar/comment-page-1/#comment-938209</link>
		<dc:creator>VirPotentia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=48001#comment-938209</guid>
		<description>on a lighter note - quite possibly the best graphics ever.

God I need to dig up my cards...

Wait, I have a full-time job.  Nevermind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on a lighter note &#8211; quite possibly the best graphics ever.</p>
<p>God I need to dig up my cards&#8230;</p>
<p>Wait, I have a full-time job.  Nevermind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
