<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaCie big boxin&#8217; it with the 5Big RAID NAS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:13:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Archive &#187; DroboApps: exactly what it sounds like</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/comment-page-1/#comment-940710</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Archive &#187; DroboApps: exactly what it sounds like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=47902#comment-940710</guid>
		<description>[...] which have been cooked up by the community since they launched the SDK a couple months ago.  Other NAS solutions have been making the rounds, and while they seem to do the job (and some for pretty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which have been cooked up by the community since they launched the SDK a couple months ago.  Other NAS solutions have been making the rounds, and while they seem to do the job (and some for pretty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lackland self storage &#124; Self Storage Review</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/comment-page-1/#comment-940550</link>
		<dc:creator>Lackland self storage &#124; Self Storage Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=47902#comment-940550</guid>
		<description>[...] LaCie, no stranger to the storage game, is putting out a unique-looking and high-capacity RAID network-attached storage box . It’ll hold up to 7.5TB at the moment, which is a huge amount but looks smaller every day as storage capacities skyrocket More about mini self storage  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LaCie, no stranger to the storage game, is putting out a unique-looking and high-capacity RAID network-attached storage box . It’ll hold up to 7.5TB at the moment, which is a huge amount but looks smaller every day as storage capacities skyrocket More about mini self storage  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diem</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/comment-page-1/#comment-938139</link>
		<dc:creator>diem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=47902#comment-938139</guid>
		<description>That giant eye is very creepy HAL 2000 style.

&quot;Stop double clicking your mouse, Dave&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That giant eye is very creepy HAL 2000 style.</p>
<p>&#8220;Stop double clicking your mouse, Dave&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/comment-page-1/#comment-938109</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=47902#comment-938109</guid>
		<description>Yeah I hear you on RAID 6... I think they&#039;re expecting enterprise folks to go for something less end-user-y.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I hear you on RAID 6&#8230; I think they&#8217;re expecting enterprise folks to go for something less end-user-y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little Red Ryan Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/13/lacie-big-boxin-it-with-the-5big-raid-nas/comment-page-1/#comment-938105</link>
		<dc:creator>little Red Ryan Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=47902#comment-938105</guid>
		<description>This looks pretty cool, and has some pretty decent stats.  I think the cons to this (and I&#039;m pretty much just picking nits here)I&#039;d like it to have dual network interfaces for higher availability and teaming operations, support telnet or SSH for admin (I don&#039;t like everything being done over http) RAID 6 has always seemed somewhat useless to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks pretty cool, and has some pretty decent stats.  I think the cons to this (and I&#8217;m pretty much just picking nits here)I&#8217;d like it to have dual network interfaces for higher availability and teaming operations, support telnet or SSH for admin (I don&#8217;t like everything being done over http) RAID 6 has always seemed somewhat useless to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
