<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molecular storage &#8211; possible but not bloody likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/16/molecular-storage-possible-but-not-bloody-likely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/16/molecular-storage-possible-but-not-bloody-likely/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:31:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NSA to store yottabytes of surveillance data in Utah megarepository</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/16/molecular-storage-possible-but-not-bloody-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-1125069</link>
		<dc:creator>NSA to store yottabytes of surveillance data in Utah megarepository</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=48799#comment-1125069</guid>
		<description>[...] the estimates is probably playing a bit fast and loose with exponential curves, but if any of the alternative storage technologies we cover here on CG are any indication, yottabytes won&#8217;t seem so big a few years from now. We [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the estimates is probably playing a bit fast and loose with exponential curves, but if any of the alternative storage technologies we cover here on CG are any indication, yottabytes won&#8217;t seem so big a few years from now. We [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon sheets may power next generation of flash storage</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/16/molecular-storage-possible-but-not-bloody-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-963570</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon sheets may power next generation of flash storage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=48799#comment-963570</guid>
		<description>[...] As SSD technology advances, it gets smaller and smaller. IBM and AMD recently created a 22nm SRAM cell, though Intel pooh-poohed the achievement. The next generation will prove even more difficult, as the physical limitations of the material (silicon) will make arrays of the current design ineffective. So either they have to find a way to work around the problem with silicon (via multi-level cell arrays, for instance), introduce a new material like graphene, or try something completely different. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As SSD technology advances, it gets smaller and smaller. IBM and AMD recently created a 22nm SRAM cell, though Intel pooh-poohed the achievement. The next generation will prove even more difficult, as the physical limitations of the material (silicon) will make arrays of the current design ineffective. So either they have to find a way to work around the problem with silicon (via multi-level cell arrays, for instance), introduce a new material like graphene, or try something completely different. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Archive &#187; Seagate sees no money in flash memory</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/10/16/molecular-storage-possible-but-not-bloody-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-946053</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Archive &#187; Seagate sees no money in flash memory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=48799#comment-946053</guid>
		<description>[...] may end up taking a bite out of solid-state&#8217;s market share over the next couple years. Not this stuff though, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may end up taking a bite out of solid-state&#8217;s market share over the next couple years. Not this stuff though, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
