Comments on: Review scores-gate: Eidos tells reviewers to hold off on Tomb Raider reviews unless they were positive

By: Jerry

Jerry — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:56:21 +0000

Games nowadays are rated WAY higher than they should be. Mediocre, unoriginal and boring games are pulling 8/10’s. Reviewers and sites everywhere are complete and total vaginas. I stopped going to gamespot because of the kane and able fiasco. Where have the true gamers and reviewers gone? Apparently it’s bad for business to give a sh!t game the sh!t score it deserves, but I would contend that pulling this retarded pump and dump bullsh*t is much worse in the long run.
It’s become so commonplace that, if a half ok game gets a 7/10 or lower (such as the newest zelda), you’ve got fanboys screaming their faces off at review sites for reviewing the score so low because they are conditioned to seeing sh!t games with high scores.
Yeah, eidos sends you a copy of their game along with a nice coffee cup, and you want to keep sucking their d!cks by rewarding their freebie with a good review. It’s influenced, and it’s bad journalism.

By: Yasser

Yasser — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:14:07 +0000

Why can’t Eidos just make better games?

Oh btw
Check out the new look JobsTAXI at http://www.jobstaxi.com
New Jobs. SK+G. Frog Design. Blue Fang Games. HCA. Dror.

By: Leonid S. Knyshov

Leonid S. Knyshov — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:47:25 +0000

Metacritic scores are directly tied with the steam ecommerce engine {seesmic_video:{”url_thumbnail”:{”value”:”http://t.seesmic.com/thumbnail/nJReRZ7Fh6_th1.jpg”}”title”:{”value”:”Metacritic scores are directly tied with the steam ecommerce engine ”}”videoUri”:{”value”:”http://www.seesmic.com/video/mkyht3CUOc”}}}

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:25:29 +0000

Fine, then at least give us some background… you can’t expect people to pick up on sarcasm when they don’t understand what the target of the sarcasm is.

By: Sheesh

Sheesh — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:50:01 +0000

God damn you people are dense – he was being sarcastic.

By: EH

EH — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:39:34 +0000

Dude, are you supposed to be a professional writer?

By: CrunchGear » Archive » Everyone’s a Metacritic: Why aggregating game reviews is absurd

Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:00:55 +0000

[...] these few lines have turned the world upside down: Go to Metacritic, which is destroying the video game industry, [...]

By: Timo

Timo — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:49:36 +0000

me too wondering why metacritic is destroying the industry. doesnt make a whole lot of sense too me (ie none).

thanks for clarifying.

By: azam

azam — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:33:42 +0000

Media powerhouses like Fox haven’t been destroying our nation for decades.but thats besides the point.

If honesty prospers so be it. If it doesn’t then let the dishonest publishers be weeded out. If a game is rated bad for whatever reason, eventually the power of the internet will help restore that balance.

I can’t wait for this system to collapse, frankly speaking. Consumers demand higher quality. I mean have these people not read blog posts for the last 4 yrs? It’s cool how the younger generated cares more about this stuff. let the weeding begin

By: meow

meow — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:40:12 +0000

Yeah, what he meant is simple people like you ruin the gaming industry.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:24:32 +0000

Can I too ask the author to qualify the statement that Metacritic is destroying the video game industry… I use Metacritic all the time and would like to know how people like me, while looking up review scores for games, are somehow contributing to the downfall of the industry.

Seriously, this sounds completely ridiculous. Comment please Nicholas?

By: TheApocalypse

TheApocalypse — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:05:26 +0000

Whether it is games, movies or music. We as consumers need to step up and start making our voices heard. Most major production companies have the asinine idea that their product has value simply because they created it, that the time and money spent to produce something, justifies its cost and its success.

Nonsense. A song is good because people like it, it is AS good as the number of people that actually take the time to listen to it, no more no less. Effort, craftsmanship, cost? All completely, and I mean COMPLETELY, irrelevant when it comes to a products actual value.

Here is a simple solution to companies who want to make money off of media…

MAKE BETTER PRODUCTS.

Consumers are no longer limited to what you buttholes tell them is good, we live in an age of infinite choice…

Get used to it.

By: schematic

schematic — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:56:25 +0000

Lame post — recommending that people read the reviews? The whole idea of a rating is that it’s a concise evaluation of the product’s appeal/quality. I don’t have time to actually read reviews — I could be gaming.

By: Gary

Gary — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:54:34 +0000

I think maybe the author of this entry meant to say that companies who practice this sort of thing are helping to destroy the industry rather than the site Metacritic – let’s hope so!

By: James

James — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:39:57 +0000

How is Metacritic “destroying the video game industry”? A sweeping statement with no explanation.

A proper explanation of the Metacritic statement would have made a far more interesting article than the one above which is, frankly, just unsurprising.

By: coleburns

coleburns — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:08:34 +0000

Really? Destroying the games industry by aggregating scores? Wow. So what is metacritic doing to the movie,music and Tv industry. please do tell.

By: Tim Daloisio

Tim Daloisio — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:45:20 +0000

I guess your premise is that since “ratings are an archaic practice that are largely irrelevant nowadays, what with reviews being a dime a dozen online” and since Metacritic is built on aggregating scores across that “dozen”, that Metacritic is destroying the industry? Is it doing the same for movies, books, etc?

I would actually go so far as to say a “collective” review score carries more weight than any individual’s score and that Metacritic provides you a single space to then link out to the original content/reviews.

Anyway….the practice of Eidos here should be in question, not the value of a utility site that isn’t even part of the story.

By: Riaz Kanani

Riaz Kanani — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:30:57 +0000

another shout for why metacritic is destroying the gameindustry.. :)

By: Gary

Gary — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:18:56 +0000

At the same time I saw a top editor about a year ago lose his job because he wouldn’t conform to the developers requests.

I think this practice by publishers will bite them in the ass before long.

By: Eidos tries to influence reviewers, achieves bad publicity | Cheeze Blog

Eidos tries to influence reviewers, achieves bad publicity | Cheeze Blog — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:09:06 +0000

[...] You can read the story here. [...]