<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New species of EeePC to cost $200, drop next year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:01:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asus to ship 0 netbooks in 2009 &#124; TechFever Network &#124; The Hot Tech News and Gadget Network</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-954934</link>
		<dc:creator>Asus to ship 0 netbooks in 2009 &#124; TechFever Network &#124; The Hot Tech News and Gadget Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=56581#comment-954934</guid>
		<description>[...] [Link][via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Link][via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-954879</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=56581#comment-954879</guid>
		<description>Of the netbooks I&#039;ve owned (3), the original Eee, with the Celeron processor, had the best performance. The thing was quick.

Now, I know other things come in to play here (memory, HD, OS, etc.). But, that machine had no problem doing the simple tasks that netbooks are intended to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the netbooks I&#8217;ve owned (3), the original Eee, with the Celeron processor, had the best performance. The thing was quick.</p>
<p>Now, I know other things come in to play here (memory, HD, OS, etc.). But, that machine had no problem doing the simple tasks that netbooks are intended to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit Gupta</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-954748</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=56581#comment-954748</guid>
		<description>I want to see some more innovation with tablets... there&#039;s something there IMO, just hasn&#039;t been done as well as it could be yet.

What happened to the one that TechcrunchIT was doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see some more innovation with tablets&#8230; there&#8217;s something there IMO, just hasn&#8217;t been done as well as it could be yet.</p>
<p>What happened to the one that TechcrunchIT was doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-954744</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=56581#comment-954744</guid>
		<description>I hear you... but at some point even browsing gets hard. I haven&#039;t gotten to try many so I&#039;m waiting to see what happens. I&#039;d say $300 is a good spot as long as they really do what they say they can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you&#8230; but at some point even browsing gets hard. I haven&#8217;t gotten to try many so I&#8217;m waiting to see what happens. I&#8217;d say $300 is a good spot as long as they really do what they say they can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/eeepc-successor-to-cost-200-drop-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-954736</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=56581#comment-954736</guid>
		<description>If slapping a Celeron in an Eee will drop it to 200 bucks, I say drop a K6 in there and get the thing down to 150.

I&#039;m kidding, of course... kinda. But, you get the point. To me, these things need to get as cheap as possible. These things are way over priced for their intended use. If they get down to the one to two hundred dollar range, I&#039;ll take two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If slapping a Celeron in an Eee will drop it to 200 bucks, I say drop a K6 in there and get the thing down to 150.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kidding, of course&#8230; kinda. But, you get the point. To me, these things need to get as cheap as possible. These things are way over priced for their intended use. If they get down to the one to two hundred dollar range, I&#8217;ll take two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
