The hard science behind your processor may not be interesting to you now, but if Intel were to say “Sorry, it’s physically impossible to go any faster,” you’d get real interested real fast. Or not. At any rate, it shouldn’t be a problem yet, as even the major quantum-physical barrier posed by the move (still far distant) from 22nm to 16nm appears to be surmountable, according to research by some guys who probably know what they’re talking about.
And in the meantime, the stage is set for Intel to deliver their next “tick” and “tock” in the form of a shrinkage (giggle) of the Nehalem architecture to a 32nm process late next year, then a move to the Sandy Bridge architecture some time in 2010. After that it’s anybody’s guess, but it’s been like clockwork so far.
I think Moore’s law has so much momentum with regard to cpu’s that the rate of change is expected (and has been for so long) therefore that is whats going to happen.
I don’t want to tell you what would happen to this world if I could make things happen just by expecting them.
Yes Moore’s law is going to happen
mmmm 32nm, 22nm, 16nm….makes my quantum-physical barrier tick tock