<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Binoculars transmit video and voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:45:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: infrared binos</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1054586</link>
		<dc:creator>infrared binos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=59401#comment-1054586</guid>
		<description>hello...this looks like some device!!no surprises that US  has the most powerful devices due to such devices...this binocular looks more like a weapon!!...i wonder how it would cost...can we people buy this techno wonder....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello&#8230;this looks like some device!!no surprises that US  has the most powerful devices due to such devices&#8230;this binocular looks more like a weapon!!&#8230;i wonder how it would cost&#8230;can we people buy this techno wonder&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luis enrique</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1021375</link>
		<dc:creator>luis enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=59401#comment-1021375</guid>
		<description>hoia soy luis enrique de huimanguillo tabasco mexico, y quisiera saber el presio de estos binoculares y en cuanto me saldria el envio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hoia soy luis enrique de huimanguillo tabasco mexico, y quisiera saber el presio de estos binoculares y en cuanto me saldria el envio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-961220</link>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=59401#comment-961220</guid>
		<description>where can i get somethig similar to this??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where can i get somethig similar to this??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binoculares que transmiten voz y video &#124; Noticias, novedades, tecnología, programación - Bit &#38; Bit</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-960375</link>
		<dc:creator>Binoculares que transmiten voz y video &#124; Noticias, novedades, tecnología, programación - Bit &#38; Bit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=59401#comment-960375</guid>
		<description>[...] Vía: CrunchGear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía: CrunchGear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binoculares que transmiten voz y video</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-959802</link>
		<dc:creator>Binoculares que transmiten voz y video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=59401#comment-959802</guid>
		<description>[...] CrunchGear Algunas anotaciones relacionadas: Secreto de CSI:Miami será revelado por medio de un video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CrunchGear Algunas anotaciones relacionadas: Secreto de CSI:Miami será revelado por medio de un video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwissFreek</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/15/binoculars-transmit-video-and-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-959759</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissFreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=59401#comment-959759</guid>
		<description>Pretty neat idea. Only issue I see here, which isn&#039;t an issue with lasers, is communications security. So with a laser, because of the highly focused beam, the only way to intercept the transmission is to place your receiver/listening device directly in the path of the beam. Which is not only more difficult since you have to be in the exact very narrow path of the beam (unlike radio which transmits in every direction) but would also most likely block some or all of the beam, and thereby alert the legitimate receiver (or transmitter) that their comms are being intercepted. They toyed with using lasers to shoot communications from airplane to airplane in fighter formations (and by toyed I&#039;m willing to be there is something like that in actual use out there) on stealth jets like the F-22 and JSF. It&#039;s very high speed data, and essentially completely undetectable when you&#039;re only shooting the beam over short distances in an airplane formation (less than a mile). They also do this sort of thing for talking to satellites I believe. Of course the trick is you have to keep the beam painted on the designated receiver, otherwise they can&#039;t hear you either, but that&#039;s why they hire the smart folks up there at AFRL.

This IR system is eye-safe, but on the downside, a regular (as opposed to laser) IR beam would have a wider beam/visible area, and would therefore be a little easier to intercept. They *do* make eye-safe lasers these days, so it&#039;d be interesting to see if they can sort of combine the best of both worlds at some point.

Of course the more common problem (which would apply to the lasers, too) is that you need clear line of sight. Not just in the radio sense but in the sense that you actually need to be able to *see* your target. This system won&#039;t work in fog, clouds, smoke, what have you. But hey, it&#039;s a step forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty neat idea. Only issue I see here, which isn&#8217;t an issue with lasers, is communications security. So with a laser, because of the highly focused beam, the only way to intercept the transmission is to place your receiver/listening device directly in the path of the beam. Which is not only more difficult since you have to be in the exact very narrow path of the beam (unlike radio which transmits in every direction) but would also most likely block some or all of the beam, and thereby alert the legitimate receiver (or transmitter) that their comms are being intercepted. They toyed with using lasers to shoot communications from airplane to airplane in fighter formations (and by toyed I&#8217;m willing to be there is something like that in actual use out there) on stealth jets like the F-22 and JSF. It&#8217;s very high speed data, and essentially completely undetectable when you&#8217;re only shooting the beam over short distances in an airplane formation (less than a mile). They also do this sort of thing for talking to satellites I believe. Of course the trick is you have to keep the beam painted on the designated receiver, otherwise they can&#8217;t hear you either, but that&#8217;s why they hire the smart folks up there at AFRL.</p>
<p>This IR system is eye-safe, but on the downside, a regular (as opposed to laser) IR beam would have a wider beam/visible area, and would therefore be a little easier to intercept. They *do* make eye-safe lasers these days, so it&#8217;d be interesting to see if they can sort of combine the best of both worlds at some point.</p>
<p>Of course the more common problem (which would apply to the lasers, too) is that you need clear line of sight. Not just in the radio sense but in the sense that you actually need to be able to *see* your target. This system won&#8217;t work in fog, clouds, smoke, what have you. But hey, it&#8217;s a step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
