Comments on: NPR picks text messaging as tech of the year http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/29/npr-picks-text-messaging-as-tech-of-the-year/ Gadgets, gear and computer hardware. Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:00:49 -0500 hourly 1 By: Internet Everywhere, Even In Your Truck? | Warwickshire Web Design http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/29/npr-picks-text-messaging-as-tech-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-969591 Internet Everywhere, Even In Your Truck? | Warwickshire Web Design Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:17:03 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=61636#comment-969591 [...] companies are struggling with the question of whether it’s gadgets or services that consumers want. As the New York Times observes, “If the most exciting thing about your [...] [...] companies are struggling with the question of whether it’s gadgets or services that consumers want. As the New York Times observes, “If the most exciting thing about your [...]

]]> By: Internet everywhere http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/29/npr-picks-text-messaging-as-tech-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-969243 Internet everywhere Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:20:19 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=61636#comment-969243 [...] companies are struggling with the question of whether it’s gadgets or services that consumers want. As the New York Times observes, “If the most exciting thing about your [...] [...] companies are struggling with the question of whether it’s gadgets or services that consumers want. As the New York Times observes, “If the most exciting thing about your [...]

]]> By: Cyber Akuma http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/29/npr-picks-text-messaging-as-tech-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-963714 Cyber Akuma Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:46:42 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=61636#comment-963714 While I say both, I feel that the service is more important than the gadget. The problem is, no matter how good the service is, it is useless if the gadget can't make decent use of it. While the service is still far more important than the gadget using it, if you can't get a single gadget out there that can at least do a decent job of using the service (dosen't have to be an incredible job, though that would help) then the service is as useless as the gadget. While I say both, I feel that the service is more important than the gadget.

The problem is, no matter how good the service is, it is useless if the gadget can’t make decent use of it. While the service is still far more important than the gadget using it, if you can’t get a single gadget out there that can at least do a decent job of using the service (dosen’t have to be an incredible job, though that would help) then the service is as useless as the gadget.

]]>