<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Canon G9: Better than a Leica?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:37:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: i</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-1017287</link>
		<dc:creator>i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-1017287</guid>
		<description>what are some good default settings for my canon G9? I&#039;m new to digital and there are too many choices for me .I understand f stops and shutter speeds . I want to just make images no larger than 8x10 .I need to shoot some events-any pointers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are some good default settings for my canon G9? I&#8217;m new to digital and there are too many choices for me .I understand f stops and shutter speeds . I want to just make images no larger than 8&#215;10 .I need to shoot some events-any pointers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Canon G10 &#124; FocuSoft Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-976397</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Canon G10 &#124; FocuSoft Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-976397</guid>
		<description>[...] not a big fan of point and shoot cameras so when I saw the Canon G9 favorably compared to a Leica (AS IF!) I just had to get my hands on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not a big fan of point and shoot cameras so when I saw the Canon G9 favorably compared to a Leica (AS IF!) I just had to get my hands on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Canon G10</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-976182</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Canon G10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-976182</guid>
		<description>[...] not a big fan of point and shoot cameras so when I saw the Canon G9 favorably compared to a Leica (AS IF!) I just had to get my hands on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not a big fan of point and shoot cameras so when I saw the Canon G9 favorably compared to a Leica (AS IF!) I just had to get my hands on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-972065</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-972065</guid>
		<description>Links like this remind me why I should stick to other sources for photography news.  Perhaps a year ago the article was relevant (and written with a skewed perspective); taken in the present context, this is useless at best, nonsense at worse.  The M8 is a unique camera that has its purpose. There are countless reasons to purchase one as there are countless other reasons to purchase a P&amp;S.  More recent options like the lumix G1 allow the use of Leica glass.  Olympus&#039; e420 is another lightweight pocketable option as is the Sigma DP1/2 (no M lens adaptor for these, but dynamic range of a larger sensor and size/weight make them decent travel companions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links like this remind me why I should stick to other sources for photography news.  Perhaps a year ago the article was relevant (and written with a skewed perspective); taken in the present context, this is useless at best, nonsense at worse.  The M8 is a unique camera that has its purpose. There are countless reasons to purchase one as there are countless other reasons to purchase a P&amp;S.  More recent options like the lumix G1 allow the use of Leica glass.  Olympus&#8217; e420 is another lightweight pocketable option as is the Sigma DP1/2 (no M lens adaptor for these, but dynamic range of a larger sensor and size/weight make them decent travel companions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Flo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-972029</link>
		<dc:creator>News Flo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-972029</guid>
		<description>Great story! I linked to it from my website...
Greetings from Germany</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story! I linked to it from my website&#8230;<br />
Greetings from Germany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971988</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971988</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been shooting on a G6 for the last few years and love it.  Though hands down my old G2 was my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been shooting on a G6 for the last few years and love it.  Though hands down my old G2 was my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon G9 a Better Travel Camera Than Leica M8?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971971</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon G9 a Better Travel Camera Than Leica M8?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971971</guid>
		<description>[...] via &#8220;The Canon G9: Better than a Leica?&#8221; by CrunchGear.  &#8594; permalink &#160;&#160;  share this post &#160;&#160; tags: canon, g9, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via &ldquo;The Canon G9: Better than a Leica?&rdquo; by CrunchGear.  &rarr; permalink &nbsp;&nbsp;  share this post &nbsp;&nbsp; tags: canon, g9, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971921</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971921</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re wrong about the zoom or mistaken because I have the G9 and it zooms in and out perfectly smoothly.  It also responds almost instantly and move very fast, compared to my previous camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re wrong about the zoom or mistaken because I have the G9 and it zooms in and out perfectly smoothly.  It also responds almost instantly and move very fast, compared to my previous camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971920</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971920</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re wrong about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re wrong about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frode Hegland</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971913</link>
		<dc:creator>Frode Hegland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971913</guid>
		<description>The Lumix LX3 is also quite amazing with brilliant HD (720) video with a mic better than many Pro level HD cams. And the in-camera color controls means that I can make BW videos in high def of my little adventures and edit them with QuickTime Player, export to Apple TV or iPhone and post them online without a moment in the (wonderful but a bit heavy) FCP. Hey, it&#039;s just wonderful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lumix LX3 is also quite amazing with brilliant HD (720) video with a mic better than many Pro level HD cams. And the in-camera color controls means that I can make BW videos in high def of my little adventures and edit them with QuickTime Player, export to Apple TV or iPhone and post them online without a moment in the (wonderful but a bit heavy) FCP. Hey, it&#8217;s just wonderful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971871</link>
		<dc:creator>ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971871</guid>
		<description>nice monkey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice monkey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alamgir Kahn</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971869</link>
		<dc:creator>Alamgir Kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971869</guid>
		<description>I put CHDK on my card for my Canon S5 IS.  This software is *not* for non-techy!  It&#039;s not simple to install, and once installed, it&#039;s not the most intuitive piece of software in the world--granted, the UI is limited to what you can do on the small screen of a camera.

That said, CHDK has some pretty amazing tools, the best of which are a bunch of user-driven scripts that allow the camera to do things like motion detection pictures, DHR, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put CHDK on my card for my Canon S5 IS.  This software is *not* for non-techy!  It&#8217;s not simple to install, and once installed, it&#8217;s not the most intuitive piece of software in the world&#8211;granted, the UI is limited to what you can do on the small screen of a camera.</p>
<p>That said, CHDK has some pretty amazing tools, the best of which are a bunch of user-driven scripts that allow the camera to do things like motion detection pictures, DHR, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971854</link>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971854</guid>
		<description>If I was suckered by anything it was a good camera story. I understand that this is kind of like a n00b saying his $100 Sony speakers are as good as some hand-made Murbletosh 4000 with real wood highlights that cost $10,000 each. On the aggregate, you get what you pay for but the pictures were pretty and I like both companies so it was interesting to see a comparison like this. Shoot me next time you see me for being such a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was suckered by anything it was a good camera story. I understand that this is kind of like a n00b saying his $100 Sony speakers are as good as some hand-made Murbletosh 4000 with real wood highlights that cost $10,000 each. On the aggregate, you get what you pay for but the pictures were pretty and I like both companies so it was interesting to see a comparison like this. Shoot me next time you see me for being such a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wuthering</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971829</link>
		<dc:creator>wuthering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971829</guid>
		<description>I have the G7. I think it&#039;s good. Otherwise M8 is too expensive for me. 
And I think, photographer is more important than the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the G7. I think it&#8217;s good. Otherwise M8 is too expensive for me.<br />
And I think, photographer is more important than the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nborghi</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971816</link>
		<dc:creator>nborghi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971816</guid>
		<description>I asked some days ago for the best prosumer p&amp;s camera on Lightstalkers.org (a great community) 
Check the answers here: http://www.lightstalkers.org/best-prosumer-level-pointshoot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked some days ago for the best prosumer p&amp;s camera on Lightstalkers.org (a great community)<br />
Check the answers here: <a href="http://www.lightstalkers.org/best-prosumer-level-pointshoot" rel="nofollow">http://www.lightstalkers.org/best-prosumer-level-pointshoot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nborghi</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971814</link>
		<dc:creator>nborghi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971814</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t agree more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t agree more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahesh</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971778</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it! What is the point of this article? Are you saying that the G9 is better than the M8? If so, that is NOT obvious from the article. Are you complaining that the G9 is a run-of-the-mill P&amp;S? There&#039;s no doubt about that either if you ignore the price and the fact that a lot of suckers pay that price for nothing.

Anyway ... what is the point of this article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it! What is the point of this article? Are you saying that the G9 is better than the M8? If so, that is NOT obvious from the article. Are you complaining that the G9 is a run-of-the-mill P&amp;S? There&#8217;s no doubt about that either if you ignore the price and the fact that a lot of suckers pay that price for nothing.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8230; what is the point of this article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaSlackers</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971765</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaSlackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971765</guid>
		<description>As many other readers have noted and with all due respect, John - Were you saucing it up when you wrote this ? Oh, and who edits this crap anyway? Crunchgear can be good and often reliable, but this is totally useless crap start to finish. I&#039;ve seen better writing from a third grader...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many other readers have noted and with all due respect, John &#8211; Were you saucing it up when you wrote this ? Oh, and who edits this crap anyway? Crunchgear can be good and often reliable, but this is totally useless crap start to finish. I&#8217;ve seen better writing from a third grader&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nader</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971742</link>
		<dc:creator>Nader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971742</guid>
		<description>I got the G9 and am fully satisfied with it. Bought in Hong Kong for cheap last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the G9 and am fully satisfied with it. Bought in Hong Kong for cheap last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janes</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/01/18/the-canon-g9-better-than-a-leica/comment-page-1/#comment-971735</link>
		<dc:creator>Janes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=66343#comment-971735</guid>
		<description>What’s up with the monkey, has it started a twitbook app based on a Mac server or something equally newsworthy?

__________________________
http://kisalt.net/d2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s up with the monkey, has it started a twitbook app based on a Mac server or something equally newsworthy?</p>
<p>__________________________<br />
<a href="http://kisalt.net/d2" rel="nofollow">http://kisalt.net/d2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
