
We’ve been aware of the DP2 for some time, and although its predecessor was coolly received, I’m excited about this one. Everyone agreed that the DP1 was a technical accomplishment, but its actual performance was lacking. AF, shutter lag, speed in general was an issue, poor low light performance — the list goes on, even more so than I remember. But if Sigma has made the changes that need to happen, this could be a very impressive camera.
Photo Gallery by Picturesurf
But the more I look at the specs, the more it looks the same. It uses a similar sensor (after buying out Foveon they may have appropriated some of their improved tech), a similar fixed lens (though significantly faster — f/2.8 vs. f/4), and the body looks almost completely unchanged. The button configuration has been switched around somewhat, but that’s about it, and the LCD screen (which was reviled in reviews) doesn’t seem to have changed either. You can focus a little closer (11 inches) but that’s not saying much.
I’m really hoping this camera turns out to be a better piece of kit than the DP1, but unless a lot of the changes are unadvertised, I don’t think it’ll be surpassing it by much. Still, we’ll do what we can to review it and cover what the rest of the world says about this interesting camera.
[via Imaging Resource]










From what the gentleman above write I don’t think he has used the camera. True, it not for everyone, but, like its companion the SD14, the results from the DP1 are nothing short of spectacular and would compare it with the Cannon 5d. The sensor produces a plastic, 3 dimensional quality unattainable using the Bayer sensor. As far as sharpness is concerned it seems to me a toss up, but I think the Foveon records more information and can be “resized,” “blown up” more successfully.
See
Only hoping that manufaturer adds image stabiliser to the camera at least if happen camera shake from hands during pressing down shutter will help or prevent from picture blur. Thank you.