<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujifilm F200EXR starts shipping this weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/05/fujifilm-f200exr-starts-shipping-this-weekend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/05/fujifilm-f200exr-starts-shipping-this-weekend/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:34:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: macsuperfly</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/05/fujifilm-f200exr-starts-shipping-this-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-992864</link>
		<dc:creator>macsuperfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=76731#comment-992864</guid>
		<description>The exr sensor in the very least is bigger than most pocket camera sensors, this means lower noise (especially at low light/high iso) it is 1/1.6 inches verses 1/1.23 which is common now. Some people have used it,  http://f200exr.com has a list of webpages that contains sample pictures.   Also, you are not paying for more megapixels, the more megapixels within the same size sensor the more noise you introduce so you do not want an overly ambitious resolution (megapixels).  What is supposed to be special about the f200exr is that it reduces the megapixels when you are using higher ISO (or when you just plan set it to do this) it uses a technique called &quot;pixel binning&quot; to combine pixels so that you have less megapixels but lower noise. I won&#039;t go into the pros and cons of this but the exr sensor is supposed to optimize pixel binning. the website that I mentioned has a discussion of the exr sensor as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exr sensor in the very least is bigger than most pocket camera sensors, this means lower noise (especially at low light/high iso) it is 1/1.6 inches verses 1/1.23 which is common now. Some people have used it,  <a href="http://f200exr.com" rel="nofollow">http://f200exr.com</a> has a list of webpages that contains sample pictures.   Also, you are not paying for more megapixels, the more megapixels within the same size sensor the more noise you introduce so you do not want an overly ambitious resolution (megapixels).  What is supposed to be special about the f200exr is that it reduces the megapixels when you are using higher ISO (or when you just plan set it to do this) it uses a technique called &#8220;pixel binning&#8221; to combine pixels so that you have less megapixels but lower noise. I won&#8217;t go into the pros and cons of this but the exr sensor is supposed to optimize pixel binning. the website that I mentioned has a discussion of the exr sensor as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanatical Gear</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/05/fujifilm-f200exr-starts-shipping-this-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-988996</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanatical Gear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=76731#comment-988996</guid>
		<description>Has anyone used the device yet? I&#039;d be curious to know how the EXR sensor is increasing the picture quality on the device. Its definitely a nice device but considering an 8MP can be had for around $100 right now the extra 4MP don&#039;t seem worth the additional $295.95 in my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone used the device yet? I&#8217;d be curious to know how the EXR sensor is increasing the picture quality on the device. Its definitely a nice device but considering an 8MP can be had for around $100 right now the extra 4MP don&#8217;t seem worth the additional $295.95 in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
