<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First review of Radeon 4890 HD hits the webs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/01/first-review-of-radeon-4890-hd-hits-the-webs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/01/first-review-of-radeon-4890-hd-hits-the-webs/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:42:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How do NVIDIA and AMD&#8217;s latest graphics cards stack up vs. each other?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/01/first-review-of-radeon-4890-hd-hits-the-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-1003098</link>
		<dc:creator>How do NVIDIA and AMD&#8217;s latest graphics cards stack up vs. each other?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82079#comment-1003098</guid>
		<description>[...] AMD and NVIDIA are a little less starkly separated. For around $250 (the mid-high sweet spot), the 4890 and GTX 275 are remarkably well-matched &#8212; more so than any two equivalently priced cards from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AMD and NVIDIA are a little less starkly separated. For around $250 (the mid-high sweet spot), the 4890 and GTX 275 are remarkably well-matched &mdash; more so than any two equivalently priced cards from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offiziell vorgestellt: ATI Radeon HD 4890 &#171; 11tech</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/01/first-review-of-radeon-4890-hd-hits-the-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-1000600</link>
		<dc:creator>Offiziell vorgestellt: ATI Radeon HD 4890 &#171; 11tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82079#comment-1000600</guid>
		<description>[...] Transistoren und zusätzliche Overclocker-Optionen, der muss hier natürlich zuschlagen. (fritz) (crunchgear, electronista, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transistoren und zusätzliche Overclocker-Optionen, der muss hier natürlich zuschlagen. (fritz) (crunchgear, electronista, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1073329245">Falk Jeromin</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/01/first-review-of-radeon-4890-hd-hits-the-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-1000491</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1073329245">Falk Jeromin</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82079#comment-1000491</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Gamestar was breaking the NDA for this one - official launch is today. And other reviews (like http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,680543/Review-Ati-Radeon-HD-4890-versus-Nvidia-Geforce-GTX-275/Reviews/) don&#039;t show such a clear picture, the GTX 275 is a tought compititor for the HD 4890 - which is not in reach for the GTX 295.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Gamestar was breaking the NDA for this one &#8211; official launch is today. And other reviews (like <a href="http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,680543/Review-Ati-Radeon-HD-4890-versus-Nvidia-Geforce-GTX-275/Reviews/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,680543/Review-Ati-Radeon-HD-4890-versus-Nvidia-Geforce-GTX-275/Reviews/)</a> don&#8217;t show such a clear picture, the GTX 275 is a tought compititor for the HD 4890 &#8211; which is not in reach for the GTX 295.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First review of Radeon 4890 HD hits the webs &#124; Tech Stories, Tech Videos, Tech Tweets, Tech Pictures, Tech News</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/01/first-review-of-radeon-4890-hd-hits-the-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-1000454</link>
		<dc:creator>First review of Radeon 4890 HD hits the webs &#124; Tech Stories, Tech Videos, Tech Tweets, Tech Pictures, Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82079#comment-1000454</guid>
		<description>[...] First review of Radeon 4890 HD hits the webs    April 1st, 2009  &#124; Tags: good job, gtx, nvidia, overclocking, video card      izoomer.init(&quot;pmimg&quot;,250,197); Expect a lot more reviews in the next week or so; the 4890 is the product AMD has aimed at Nvidia&#8217;s high-end cards, and according to German site Gamestar, it&#8217;s doing a pretty good job. It couldn&#8217;t quite beat the GTX 295 without overclocking, but since it&#8217;ll probably cost about $100 less, we won&#8217;t hold that against it. If you&#8217;re looking to spend around $300 on a video card (a bit above my own price range, but certainly within that of others), this will probably be your best value for a good couple of months.[...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First review of Radeon 4890 HD hits the webs    April 1st, 2009  | Tags: good job, gtx, nvidia, overclocking, video card      izoomer.init(&#8221;pmimg&#8221;,250,197); Expect a lot more reviews in the next week or so; the 4890 is the product AMD has aimed at Nvidia&#8217;s high-end cards, and according to German site Gamestar, it&#8217;s doing a pretty good job. It couldn&#8217;t quite beat the GTX 295 without overclocking, but since it&#8217;ll probably cost about $100 less, we won&#8217;t hold that against it. If you&#8217;re looking to spend around $300 on a video card (a bit above my own price range, but certainly within that of others), this will probably be your best value for a good couple of months.[...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
