<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel updating chip logos and rating system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/07/intel-updating-chip-logos-and-rating-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/07/intel-updating-chip-logos-and-rating-system/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:40:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Shull</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/07/intel-updating-chip-logos-and-rating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1015188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Shull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82879#comment-1015188</guid>
		<description>I just want to buy the most computer I can get with the budget I have. 

The branding may make sense to some, however, I just fall back to MHz, and when I can&#039;t get a straight answer (e.g. hiding the details behind a brand), I walk over to AMD. Lately, I have been walking more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to buy the most computer I can get with the budget I have. </p>
<p>The branding may make sense to some, however, I just fall back to MHz, and when I can&#8217;t get a straight answer (e.g. hiding the details behind a brand), I walk over to AMD. Lately, I have been walking more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/07/intel-updating-chip-logos-and-rating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1003559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82879#comment-1003559</guid>
		<description>&quot;Expect to see less processor brands&quot; ???
No. I would expect to see FEWER processor brands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Expect to see less processor brands&#8221; ???<br />
No. I would expect to see FEWER processor brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5Words for April 7th, 2009&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/04/07/intel-updating-chip-logos-and-rating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1003454</link>
		<dc:creator>5Words for April 7th, 2009&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=82879#comment-1003454</guid>
		<description>[...] New logos for Intel chips. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New logos for Intel chips. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
