Comments on: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen on track to be worst-rated $400m movie ever

By: Sniper mike

Sniper mike — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:58:14 +0000

AWSOME MOVIE 10/10000000000 GREAT SPECIAL EFFECTS WOULD HAVE BEEN AWSOME IN 3-D

By: Sniper mike

Sniper mike — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:57:08 +0000

AWESOME MOVIE 1000000/10 :) WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER IN 3D THOUGH! THE ROBOT SCENES WAS AWSOME!!!

By: JP

JP — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:30:40 +0000

The Dark Knight spoiled me. I actually half-way expect a nostalgic action-figure flick to make it through 2 hours without a dozen plot holes.

Transformers 2 had amazing effects, some very cool IMAX shots, a really hot (and dumb) lead actress…but it also had a really confusing story, too many “comedic” sidekicks, too many glamour shots, and too many inane subplots.

By: gene

gene — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:29:36 +0000

shut up

By: ak47

ak47 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:55 +0000

hey limo, you suck with your sad movies that make you cry like a baby, wy i would like to watch a movie thats make me cry? i usualy do this in my real life. you hate the movie because you know that it’s the best movie of this year and you know it you just do not accept.

By: nick otero

nick otero — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:08:50 +0000

it sucks!!!worst movie of the year.all you people care about is explosions and megan fox.bad story,bad plot,bad special effects,and bad film.Megan fox is hot though.

By: Video: Transformers 2 in one minute

Video: Transformers 2 in one minute — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:31:17 +0000

[...] want to waste $37 to see Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen at the movie theater? Most critics wouldn’t blame you although a lot of fans are enjoying the summer flick. But anyway, watch the video above and save [...]

By: compuguy1088

compuguy1088 — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:42:45 +0000

I guess I’m not much of a transformers fan…but I can find my fair share of explosions and such with better substance elsewhere (mythbusters for example :D)

By: Nicholas Deleon

Nicholas Deleon — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:39:36 +0000

Hey, I liked Atonement!

By: Cathosach

Cathosach — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:46:53 +0000

Name me one movie that’s been well-received but that wasn’t “entertaining.” – Atonement

By: Transformers 2 destroza a toda la competencia

Transformers 2 destroza a toda la competencia — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:57:39 +0000

[...] Fuente: CrunchGear [...]

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:13:39 +0000

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is the biggest misuse of ILM’s special effects to date. Michael Bay is an action pornographer where every shot is the money shot. Does every line of dialogue need that dolly in spin around the actor’s face? Everything is so over the top, the sequences are dizzying and poorly edited. Someone needs to strap Michael Bay down and have him watch “Raiders of the Lost Ark” about nine times in a row, so he can learn how movie is supposed to be shot and edited. This movie passing the $400 mil mark is a disgrace. Worst summer movie ever.

By: limo

limo — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:45:44 +0000

I agree with everyone else, this isn’t a movie that you go into hoping for a great script and tender moments that will make you cry.not good enough !!!

By: Gryphyn

Gryphyn — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:24:17 +0000

I saw the original Transformers movie for my birthday.

I will see this Transformers movie for my birthday.

Let’s see…giant robots? Check. ‘Splosions? Check. Megan Foxxy? Definitely. Thought provoking characterization and dialogue? Aww, Gee, Wally.

Win.

By: Nick

Nick — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:21:13 +0000

That’s silly.

Critics loved WALL-E and Up. Does that mean you hated them?

Toy Story? Godfather? Taxi Driver? Citizen Cane?

By: Nicholas Deleon

Nicholas Deleon — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:13:41 +0000

I have never seen a movie more than once while it was still in theaters, so more power to you. (I generally don’t watch movie more than once at all, with the exception of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off for some reason.)

By: xavier

xavier — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:52:24 +0000

TRANSFORMES IS THE ONE OF THE BEST MOVIES I’VE EVER SEEN!!! … AND YES, I WILL PAY 3-5 MORE TIMES TO SEE IT AGAIN!

By: Trev

Trev — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:36:55 +0000

This movie is pure win. I’ve seen it 3 times and it was just as good each time around.

By: Jason

Jason — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:43:23 +0000

I thought it rocked….lots of slow-mo fight scenes and Megan Fox!

I got in trouble by my date when I said “MMM” when Megan first popped on screen. Oops.

By: Surgere

Surgere — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:07:05 +0000

Here Here!
The fight sequences, I felt, were incredibly improved over the first movie.
I got lost sometimes in the first movie when close combat fight scenes would just turn into one giant blob of shiny metal.
I thought they did a really good job on the second movie with choosing better angles and clearer sequences.