Comments on: New Sharp LED-backlit LE700 TVs: not fancy enough?

By: rudolph hucker

rudolph hucker — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:26:57 +0000

i have a one year old sharp aquos.it’s an awesome tv for the money.
much btter than the pioneer plasma it replaced

By: sharp led tv

sharp led tv — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:45:17 +0000

Managed to get my hands on a LC40LE700E a couple of weeks back and my first impressions were pretty good. Must admit that the colours were a bit too vivid when compared to Samsung LED TV but after a bit of tweeking I managed to tone the picture down a bit. Great telly for the money. I sure they will sell well here in the UK.

By: bill taylor

bill taylor — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:31:01 +0000

well here in the uk i get a free 5 year warrentee and the set cost around £950, as i change my tv every 5 years i cant really lose can i,but i have been told the audio not really up to much any coments welcome.ttfn.

By: bryan

bryan — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:43:05 +0000

i agree as an avid fan of new av gudgets for several years. sharp compared to samsung when it comes to outlook design i may say samsung they have done it well specially in LED arrays tv’s slimmer design but when we talk about durability wise and some an exceptional picture sharp is the did it.Try to compare the materials that samsung has specially the crystal designed i think this red stuff are fluid injected sometimes it breaks out,so pretty annoying, just see for your self try to visit some stores having these all stuff then check it out and compared. c yah!

By: Harvey

Harvey — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:45:00 +0000

The sharp led tv uses a grid of leds behind the screen as opposed to the samsung edge led lighting. having compared the two closely the sharp has a far superior picture quality over the samsung.

Dont be fooled by the slimmer design of the samsung sure it hangs better on the wall but if your actually after a tv that produces an exceptional picture buy the sharpe 700 series. if not buy a canaletto

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:30:33 +0000

I hear all of you but the bottom line is that my console will accept a 49.5′ width and Samsung does not have a 52″, only a 46′ will fit. However, Sharp will fit beatuifully.

By: BILLY

BILLY — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:14:26 +0000

WELL FIRST I MUST SAY I HAVE ALWAYS BACKED SHARP PRODUCTS BUT JUST FOUND THIS TIME THEY ARE WAY BEHIND EVERYONE ELSE, IN THE LED TV MARKET. I WAITED AND WAITED FOR IT TO COME OUT AND DECIDED ON THE SAMSUNG 40″ LED AND IT IS ABSOLUTLEY AWESOME!! HIGHLY RECCOMEND!!!

By: ChrisW

ChrisW — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:17:52 +0000

I’d avoid Philips, Ginger. My Philips 42″ plasma has broken twice in 3 years and they want $600 to fix a set that’s probably worth $700 now (it was $1900 new).

A friend just bought the Sharp 52LE700UN. It looks great in the store, but we won’t know for a few days how well it performs. It was $2000, which seems reasonable right now for an LED backlit LCD.

By: virginia mcgowan

virginia mcgowan — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:52:29 +0000

How does Philip’s LED compare? I’m researching as my TV is in the green and pink stage of dying. Ginger

By: LED TV Prices

LED TV Prices — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:25:43 +0000

Undoubtedly the Sharp TVs will be good, but I can’t help but feel the Samsung range of LED TVs look aesthetically better, with their glossy black surround.

Also I feel Sharp have missed the gun a little. Samsung have done well with their recent marketing campaign, pushing their TVs into the spotlight. Sharp will have to do a lot to catch up now.

By: Nathaneal

Nathaneal — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:40:12 +0000

I will buy SAMSUNG LED TV, the outlook of SHARP is too normal and the LED TV is so thick. SAMSUNG looked slim and beautiful. SHARP design out.

By: LCD Tv Fan

LCD Tv Fan — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:43:39 +0000

“I think It’s too expensive for my taste as of now and too my inexperience I never seen an OLED so I can’t tell if the difference is of worth buying”

Its not an oled tv, its a LCD with LED back/edge light ;) OLED is still years away so its good that LCD is making big advancements in design.

It’ll be interesting to see how sharps screen compares to the Samsung, Sony and LG’s that already use this technology, but the sharp definately isn’t as pretty!

By: Ammy

Ammy — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:32:56 +0000

Several days ago, I saw a article about SAMSUNG LED TV, which looks good. I need some time to compare the two TVs.

By: John Smith

Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:38:16 +0000

I think It’s too expensive for my taste as of now and too my inexperience I never seen an OLED so I can’t tell if the difference is of worth buying