<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CrunchGear&#8217;s Ultimate Guide to Netbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:31:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1068430</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1068430</guid>
		<description>Article Fail.

Netbooks aren&#039;t going anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article Fail.</p>
<p>Netbooks aren&#8217;t going anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah. - BlogAngle</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1068376</link>
		<dc:creator>Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah. - BlogAngle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1068376</guid>
		<description>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah. - Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1068312</link>
		<dc:creator>Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah. - Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1068312</guid>
		<description>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah.</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1068277</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1068277</guid>
		<description>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey-Computing and Technology &#187; Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah.</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1068258</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey-Computing and Technology &#187; Is 2010 the Year Of the Tablet? Nah.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1068258</guid>
		<description>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is 2010 the year of the tablet? Nah.</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1068216</link>
		<dc:creator>Is 2010 the year of the tablet? Nah.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1068216</guid>
		<description>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Origami?) but never did and we basically bumped over MIDs and into netbooks, resulting in the race to the bottom we&#8217;re now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchDeals: Wal-Mart going really cheap with the laptops this weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-2/#comment-1061333</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchDeals: Wal-Mart going really cheap with the laptops this weekend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1061333</guid>
		<description>[...] in case you need a cheap computer Wal-Mart has got your back. They&#8217;re working with HP to sell a Compaq Presario for $298 and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in case you need a cheap computer Wal-Mart has got your back. They&#8217;re working with HP to sell a Compaq Presario for $298 and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marees</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1060369</link>
		<dc:creator>marees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1060369</guid>
		<description>John I just love your responses. Keep going...

By the any idea what OS is used by the final RTM of the crunchpad? This is just eating me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John I just love your responses. Keep going&#8230;</p>
<p>By the any idea what OS is used by the final RTM of the crunchpad? This is just eating me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1058657</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1058657</guid>
		<description>Its interesting how you spew words like &quot;useless&quot; and &quot;crap&quot;, then cite video editing as the main thing that makes a computer useful or not.

Well,  I have an acer aspire one and a sony vaio p530H.

Both my wife and I work fulltime online, and she has the acer hooked up to an external monitor and finds it works perfectly for her job as an editor.

I use the sony when I travel, and have found it to be great running the adobe CS3 suite.  I write software for a living primarily in flash and do graphics editing.  

I can fit the sony in my inside jacket pocket, and now when I travel find it vastly easier than carrying a laptop in a case, and can now travel with much less carry-on.

I was at a political rally recently, and shot video on my tiny canon powershot 1000, edited it on my sony vaio using windows movie maker, and uploaded it to youtube via the wireless connection.  The computer was running Vista and didnt crash or slow me down at all in this (or any other) operation.

The only issue I have with the vaio is the startup time, it seems to take an inordinate amount of time to start up from completely off.  And, it doesnt run second life.  The Acer, however, runs Second life well enough and I actually participated in a voice based virtual interview via wireless internet and my acer aspire (so it was handling voip and rendering a live 3d virtual world space including spacial audio all at once without breaking a sweat)

Once I can put windows 7 on my vaio, I imagine it will run even smoother, and I find both of these computers to be a fantastic value for money.  For the cost of one average laptop, I recommend people buy a decent desktop and large monitors for home use (I use 2 22&quot; LCD&#039;s) and use the Vaio or the Acer for travel.

So, from personal experience, I have to completely disagree with your article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting how you spew words like &#8220;useless&#8221; and &#8220;crap&#8221;, then cite video editing as the main thing that makes a computer useful or not.</p>
<p>Well,  I have an acer aspire one and a sony vaio p530H.</p>
<p>Both my wife and I work fulltime online, and she has the acer hooked up to an external monitor and finds it works perfectly for her job as an editor.</p>
<p>I use the sony when I travel, and have found it to be great running the adobe CS3 suite.  I write software for a living primarily in flash and do graphics editing.  </p>
<p>I can fit the sony in my inside jacket pocket, and now when I travel find it vastly easier than carrying a laptop in a case, and can now travel with much less carry-on.</p>
<p>I was at a political rally recently, and shot video on my tiny canon powershot 1000, edited it on my sony vaio using windows movie maker, and uploaded it to youtube via the wireless connection.  The computer was running Vista and didnt crash or slow me down at all in this (or any other) operation.</p>
<p>The only issue I have with the vaio is the startup time, it seems to take an inordinate amount of time to start up from completely off.  And, it doesnt run second life.  The Acer, however, runs Second life well enough and I actually participated in a voice based virtual interview via wireless internet and my acer aspire (so it was handling voip and rendering a live 3d virtual world space including spacial audio all at once without breaking a sweat)</p>
<p>Once I can put windows 7 on my vaio, I imagine it will run even smoother, and I find both of these computers to be a fantastic value for money.  For the cost of one average laptop, I recommend people buy a decent desktop and large monitors for home use (I use 2 22&#8243; LCD&#8217;s) and use the Vaio or the Acer for travel.</p>
<p>So, from personal experience, I have to completely disagree with your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adre!s</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1058003</link>
		<dc:creator>adre!s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1058003</guid>
		<description>Before you write useles GARBAGE, like this, first consider the following:

- With little knowledge of the PC industry definately ASUS is an unknown brand. With a little research you&#039;d be amazed about what you would find.

-If you are recommending a &quot;2GHz processor&quot; have you taken into account if its an in order or out of order CPU? What is the IPCs that the CPU can handle. And other technical details similar to that? According to you logic an overclock Qualcomm Sanpdragon @2GHz would probably beat an 1.8GHz Celeron. Or maybe an 1.6 GHz Atom will beat a 1.5 GHz VIA Nano. No, WAIT!!! A 2.6 GHz Athlon XP will beat a 2.0  GHz Core 2 Duo...sight.

- If you write about &quot;utltimate guide to netbooks&quot; stick with the subject and review said products. Even a quick peak at any serious tech site will help you spot the differences between the products &quot;reviewed&quot; and the products your guide was supposedly wanting to talk about.

In other words, educate yourself before you spew useless crap. It&#039;s amazing that people like you are actually given permission to give their opinion on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you write useles GARBAGE, like this, first consider the following:</p>
<p>- With little knowledge of the PC industry definately ASUS is an unknown brand. With a little research you&#8217;d be amazed about what you would find.</p>
<p>-If you are recommending a &#8220;2GHz processor&#8221; have you taken into account if its an in order or out of order CPU? What is the IPCs that the CPU can handle. And other technical details similar to that? According to you logic an overclock Qualcomm Sanpdragon @2GHz would probably beat an 1.8GHz Celeron. Or maybe an 1.6 GHz Atom will beat a 1.5 GHz VIA Nano. No, WAIT!!! A 2.6 GHz Athlon XP will beat a 2.0  GHz Core 2 Duo&#8230;sight.</p>
<p>- If you write about &#8220;utltimate guide to netbooks&#8221; stick with the subject and review said products. Even a quick peak at any serious tech site will help you spot the differences between the products &#8220;reviewed&#8221; and the products your guide was supposedly wanting to talk about.</p>
<p>In other words, educate yourself before you spew useless crap. It&#8217;s amazing that people like you are actually given permission to give their opinion on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057963</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057963</guid>
		<description>these aren&#039;t netbooks. these are lightweight computers. 13&quot; is great for a genuinely small laptop - but it won&#039;t fit in my carry bag so easily. 

i think anything that is considered a netbook has a top screen size of 10-11&quot; and that&#039;s it. tch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these aren&#8217;t netbooks. these are lightweight computers. 13&#8243; is great for a genuinely small laptop &#8211; but it won&#8217;t fit in my carry bag so easily. </p>
<p>i think anything that is considered a netbook has a top screen size of 10-11&#8243; and that&#8217;s it. tch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057908</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057908</guid>
		<description>Even using your own criteria (sub 12&#039;&#039; screen) you still only reviewed one netbook. 

I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve ever bothered to look at the word, but &quot;netbook&quot; is actually a combination of two words: &quot;net&quot; and &quot;book&quot;. They&#039;re compact in size, used primarily for non-demanding internet activities and tend to have low-end specs (which are reflected in the price). 

As Justin said, people aren&#039;t replacing their laptops with these, they&#039;re getting them as complementary products for less-intensive use. You assert rather than explain that netbooks are a deadend. You also say that companies will continue to sell $200 netbooks, which I&#039;m presuming is because people are buying them.

(Also, as an aside, ultralights will never displace netbook as a classification if they use that name. It sounds like a type of cigarette. Which it, in fact, is.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even using your own criteria (sub 12&#8221; screen) you still only reviewed one netbook. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve ever bothered to look at the word, but &#8220;netbook&#8221; is actually a combination of two words: &#8220;net&#8221; and &#8220;book&#8221;. They&#8217;re compact in size, used primarily for non-demanding internet activities and tend to have low-end specs (which are reflected in the price). </p>
<p>As Justin said, people aren&#8217;t replacing their laptops with these, they&#8217;re getting them as complementary products for less-intensive use. You assert rather than explain that netbooks are a deadend. You also say that companies will continue to sell $200 netbooks, which I&#8217;m presuming is because people are buying them.</p>
<p>(Also, as an aside, ultralights will never displace netbook as a classification if they use that name. It sounds like a type of cigarette. Which it, in fact, is.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedub</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057893</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057893</guid>
		<description>I would wager many people will have both a smartphone and a netbook. There are many instances where the smartphone fails purely on size:

* Web browsing
* Video
* Maps/Navigation
* Email composition
* Documents/email attachments

In these cases, making a quick switch from your smartphone to your netbook will be an amazing relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would wager many people will have both a smartphone and a netbook. There are many instances where the smartphone fails purely on size:</p>
<p>* Web browsing<br />
* Video<br />
* Maps/Navigation<br />
* Email composition<br />
* Documents/email attachments</p>
<p>In these cases, making a quick switch from your smartphone to your netbook will be an amazing relief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedub</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057890</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057890</guid>
		<description>bless you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bless you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedub</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057887</guid>
		<description>Hallelujah, Rick.  I&#039;m as annoyed and frustrated by this post as you are. I&#039;ve been deep in this industry for 14 years and I remember the &quot;network computer&quot; well. Sun and others touted it as the next generation of computing, enabled by the Internet. The ideas were sound, but as with many innovations, it was just too early. The infrastructure wasn&#039;t there. And to be honest, the economics weren&#039;t either. Here are my thoughts on the network, hardware, OS, and applications and what factors are now in place for success. 

HARDWARE

Notebooks have honed the miniaturization skills of the ODMs and the components shared with netbooks will benefit from economies of scale.  Also, subsidies from wireless operators offering &quot;everywhere access&quot; plans tied to netbooks will eliminate hardware cost. Rumors are that a $1 netbook will hit the market this Fall.

There are a few technologies that could *define* netbooks in the next 1-2 years. Portability and use for short sessions wherever you may be are paramount. If these are not met, then netbooks will not improve upon notebooks, and they will die.

- Instant on
- Everywhere wireless (WLAN and WAN built in)
- Super-long battery life (6-10 hrs)
- Lightweight - under 3 lbs

Screen and keyboard sizes will be the largest that still allow these constraints to be met.

NETWORK &amp; WEB APPS

* Bandwidth is now plentiful, cheap, and wireless
* Standards have matured for web application development
* Browser capabilities now enable rich applications to be built with AJAX and more recently HTML 5 with access to OS and hardware features
* Open source has taken massive costs out of cloud infrastructure
... and the list goes on

This time, because of the technology trends above and the mass adoption of broadband Web use for email, browsing incl. video, social networking, and even VoIP, etc. the netbook will be a commercial success.

OS &amp; NATIVE APPS

One more point on the OS. To echo what Rick said, consumers don&#039;t care (or more accurately, don&#039;t want to care) what OS the have. They want web access and a few key applications that could run on top of Linux or whatever:

* Microsoft Office
* Microsoft Outlook
* Apple iTunes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallelujah, Rick.  I&#8217;m as annoyed and frustrated by this post as you are. I&#8217;ve been deep in this industry for 14 years and I remember the &#8220;network computer&#8221; well. Sun and others touted it as the next generation of computing, enabled by the Internet. The ideas were sound, but as with many innovations, it was just too early. The infrastructure wasn&#8217;t there. And to be honest, the economics weren&#8217;t either. Here are my thoughts on the network, hardware, OS, and applications and what factors are now in place for success. </p>
<p>HARDWARE</p>
<p>Notebooks have honed the miniaturization skills of the ODMs and the components shared with netbooks will benefit from economies of scale.  Also, subsidies from wireless operators offering &#8220;everywhere access&#8221; plans tied to netbooks will eliminate hardware cost. Rumors are that a $1 netbook will hit the market this Fall.</p>
<p>There are a few technologies that could *define* netbooks in the next 1-2 years. Portability and use for short sessions wherever you may be are paramount. If these are not met, then netbooks will not improve upon notebooks, and they will die.</p>
<p>- Instant on<br />
- Everywhere wireless (WLAN and WAN built in)<br />
- Super-long battery life (6-10 hrs)<br />
- Lightweight &#8211; under 3 lbs</p>
<p>Screen and keyboard sizes will be the largest that still allow these constraints to be met.</p>
<p>NETWORK &amp; WEB APPS</p>
<p>* Bandwidth is now plentiful, cheap, and wireless<br />
* Standards have matured for web application development<br />
* Browser capabilities now enable rich applications to be built with AJAX and more recently HTML 5 with access to OS and hardware features<br />
* Open source has taken massive costs out of cloud infrastructure<br />
&#8230; and the list goes on</p>
<p>This time, because of the technology trends above and the mass adoption of broadband Web use for email, browsing incl. video, social networking, and even VoIP, etc. the netbook will be a commercial success.</p>
<p>OS &amp; NATIVE APPS</p>
<p>One more point on the OS. To echo what Rick said, consumers don&#8217;t care (or more accurately, don&#8217;t want to care) what OS the have. They want web access and a few key applications that could run on top of Linux or whatever:</p>
<p>* Microsoft Office<br />
* Microsoft Outlook<br />
* Apple iTunes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057492</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057492</guid>
		<description>This article completely misses the point of the netbook, and is misinformed by under-representing the market.  You clearly do not need a 2GHz processor or 2GB of RAM in a budget netbook, that defeats the purpose.  Ultralights with good specs and design elements &amp; materials will stay at the top end of the portable computer price spectrum for years to come, period.  This is clearly a very opinionated author, not an unbiased evaluation.  Explain to us exactly how this is the &quot;Ultimate Guide to Netbooks?&quot;  Don&#039;t you have an editorial staff at CrunchGear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article completely misses the point of the netbook, and is misinformed by under-representing the market.  You clearly do not need a 2GHz processor or 2GB of RAM in a budget netbook, that defeats the purpose.  Ultralights with good specs and design elements &amp; materials will stay at the top end of the portable computer price spectrum for years to come, period.  This is clearly a very opinionated author, not an unbiased evaluation.  Explain to us exactly how this is the &#8220;Ultimate Guide to Netbooks?&#8221;  Don&#8217;t you have an editorial staff at CrunchGear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sascha Pallenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1057254</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha Pallenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1057254</guid>
		<description>Netbooks sales to double in 09 (136% growth in the US):

http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/displaysearch/hs.xsl/071309_mini_note_netbook_shipments_to_double_y_y_to_more_than_30m_units_in_2009.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netbooks sales to double in 09 (136% growth in the US):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/displaysearch/hs.xsl/071309_mini_note_netbook_shipments_to_double_y_y_to_more_than_30m_units_in_2009.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/displaysearch/hs.xsl/071309_mini_note_netbook_shipments_to_double_y_y_to_more_than_30m_units_in_2009.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1056949</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1056949</guid>
		<description>Netbooks will die soon?  Not a chance.  They are now and will continue to be the hottest hardware product for many years.  They are the greatest computer product to come along yet... and I&#039;ve been around since the punch-card and tape days before there was any such thing as a &quot;personal&quot; computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netbooks will die soon?  Not a chance.  They are now and will continue to be the hottest hardware product for many years.  They are the greatest computer product to come along yet&#8230; and I&#8217;ve been around since the punch-card and tape days before there was any such thing as a &#8220;personal&#8221; computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBN</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1056858</link>
		<dc:creator>NBN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1056858</guid>
		<description>This is the blog equivalent of a &quot;troll&quot;. 

There is one point that has merit- that the current batch of netbook offerings will become obsolete. But that is true for any tech product. There&#039;s always something better on the horizon. The Atom processors in today&#039;s netbooks will be replaced by the next generation. Perhaps CULV will become the netbook standard. Either way, for the vast majority of non-technical people out there, the performance offered in netbooks is sufficient for the tradeoff in increased portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the blog equivalent of a &#8220;troll&#8221;. </p>
<p>There is one point that has merit- that the current batch of netbook offerings will become obsolete. But that is true for any tech product. There&#8217;s always something better on the horizon. The Atom processors in today&#8217;s netbooks will be replaced by the next generation. Perhaps CULV will become the netbook standard. Either way, for the vast majority of non-technical people out there, the performance offered in netbooks is sufficient for the tradeoff in increased portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sascha Pallenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/15/crunchgears-ultimate-guide-to-netbooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1056557</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha Pallenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=100900#comment-1056557</guid>
		<description>Techcrunch has some different interests. Always keep in mind that they are going to launch the Crunchpad soon. A solution and formfactor that is almost a decade old and never ever made a breakthrough. But they are trying everything to position it as the big Netbook competitor.  That&#039;s why you can expect more of these spin-articles.

I guess that&#039;s what&#039;s happening when internet guys with a lack of hardware background are trying to promote their own devices. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techcrunch has some different interests. Always keep in mind that they are going to launch the Crunchpad soon. A solution and formfactor that is almost a decade old and never ever made a breakthrough. But they are trying everything to position it as the big Netbook competitor.  That&#8217;s why you can expect more of these spin-articles.</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening when internet guys with a lack of hardware background are trying to promote their own devices. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
