If you’ve misplaced your TV’s remote control one too many times, then I might suggest firmly attaching it to a gigantic anvil-like object via an unnecessarily thick length of chain.
Think your little toddler will run off and hide it in his playpen now? No sir. If he’s even able to move the anvil at all, it’ll fall onto the floor or his foot which will either scare him or seriously incapacitate him.
Whatever the case, your remote control will remain within arm’s reach of your tattered La-Z-Boy.
I’m not quite sure how much you’d have to spend on an anvil, the chain, and the closure surrounding the remote control but can you really put a price on the peace of mind that’s afforded by always knowing that your remote control will be exactly where you left it?
[via There, I Fixed It]
That’s not an anvil. It’s a section of railroad track. Not the easiest thing to acquire.
Dude he didn’t say it was an anvil he said anvil like learn to read!
Actually it was referred to as ‘anvil-like’ (you forgot the hyphen). Also, the second reference in the article it was simply referred to as anvil (fourth paragraph, first sentence).
It also looks nothing like an anvil. Its more than apparent (as Jeremy pointed out) that is a section of railroad track. I
Ok you have a more than valid point, but you have to agree he went about it the wrong way
i would guess that is actual a rail for a crane or some other industrial purpose. which are not too hard to get. where i work, standard size would be 30 lb/yd. the one in the picture could be as much as 104 lb/yd. so i for about a 1 ft piece could weigh anywhere between 10 and 35 lbs.
none of you do smithing do you. A section of railroad track is used as a anvil quite often as its a bit easier to shape and cut the metal then trying to modify a cast anvil.
why even argue as to what it looks like or what it is, its just awesome in general. ‘Nuff said
ill agree it is awsome no doubt but its fun to argue or shall i say debate.
70-624
70-649
70-284
70-294
70-299