<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrunchGear &#187; Seth Porges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/author/seth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Futurist: Will Human Laziness Burst The Web 2.0 Bubble?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/27/the-futurist-will-human-laziness-burst-the-web-20-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/27/the-futurist-will-human-laziness-burst-the-web-20-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the futurist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/27/the-futurist-will-human-laziness-burst-the-web-20-bubble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
At first, the Web was simple. It was a world so full of static pages with useless information that a GIF of a dancing hamster or (god forbid) baby could turn into an overnight sensation. It was an era so enthralled with its own existence that its purveyors, creators, and financiers never really asked if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/asleepatdesk.jpg"><br />
At first, the Web was simple. It was a world so full of static pages with useless information that a GIF of a dancing hamster or (god forbid) baby could turn into an overnight sensation. It was an era so enthralled with its own existence that its purveyors, creators, and financiers never really asked if it was sustainable until it was too late. And, as we can all learn from <a href="http://www.southparkzone.com/episode-vid-217.htm">South Park, without a Phase 2, Phase 3 can never equal profit. </a></p>
<p>Pop.</p>
<p>Web 2.0 is/was a bit different. If the defining trait of the first Web cycle was the stupid animated GIF, the current &#8220;It&#8221; sites all have one thing in common: They are, to varying degrees, reliant on user-generated content. Without your neighbor/classmate/sister/girlfriend&#8217;s tireless devotion to keeping her profile up-to-date, MySpace would merely be a place for FOX to promote its properties. Without a horde of news junkies yearning to see their username in digital print, Digg would be an ugly page of yellow and white (and their new profile feature would be a joke).</p>
<p>And that is why the Web 2.0 era will come to end sooner rather than later. Because if there is one immutable law of humankind, it is that we are really, really lazy.</p>
<p><span id="more-13783"></span></p>
<p>Do you have a Friendster profile? If you do (and you don&#8217;t happen to live in the Philippines, where it is bizarrely popular), chances are you haven&#8217;t touched it in a few years. Maybe it was because something newer and more feature-filled came along in the form of MySpace, or maybe you just got sick of it. Either way&#8211;You gave up on it. As did I.</p>
<p>And MySpace&#8211;that was great for awhile. Everybody who was anybody was on it. Hell, your mom may have even sent you a &#8220;friend&#8221; request. Then you got lots of spam and your computer started to crash because of unsolicited death metal songs playing through your speakers. Either way, Facebook gave you everything you wanted from MySpace, only it was much cleaner, easier to use, and a bit more &#8220;mature&#8221; feeling. Hell, you&#8217;re no kid anymore. Leave MySpace to the tweens.</p>
<p>So then you built up your Facebook profile. Refound the exact same people you had &#8220;friended&#8221; on Friendster and MySpace, and added a bunch of cool new &#8220;applications&#8221; of various quality. You may even think you have a permanent &#8220;home&#8221; for your profile now. That is, unless Facebook begins to remind you too much of your college years, and all the high school kids who are now on it take over. Then it might be time to grow up and invest your time in LinkedIn.</p>
<p>The point is, it is hard work keeping up with these things. And there will be a point down the line when, even if it&#8217;s not done in a collective shrug, the Web world will just say &#8220;screw it&#8221;, and update their pages more and more seldom, until Facebook resembles Friendster.</p>
<p>And Wikipedia&#8211;perhaps the Web&#8217;s greatest gift to humanity &#8211;is essentially based on the idea that people will be generous with their time and editing skills. While the prospect of giving the gift of knowledge to the world may sound tempting, there will come a point when the only people who have time to frequently check up on articles and update them will be egomaniacs making sure that everybody knows that Scott Tuckerson Kicks Ass or that their best frenemy&#8217;s name appears in an article about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&#038;oldid=63000469">oral sex</a>.</p>
<p>Right now, the bubble that the Web exists in is not so much a financial bubble as it is a time bubble. There is still a novelty for a lot of people associated with finding friends on social networking sites, Digging their favorite stories, updating articles about the history of pinball, and leaving comments on their favorite blogs. But that will wear off. People will revert back to the things they used to do: like Minesweeper and work. And without millions of generous mouse-clickers, most of Web 2.0 is weakened, if not entirely useless.</p>
<p>Whenever it gets here, Web 3.0 may be bigger and better than what we have now, but you can bet that it won&#8217;t be foolish enough to rely on the unreliable. And there is nothing more unreliable than human nature.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/futurist.jpg" border="0" class="center"><br />
<i>Seth Porges writes on future technology and its role in personal electronics for his column, The Futurist. It appears every Thursday and an archive of past columns is available <A HREF=" http://www.crunchgear.com/category/the%20futurist">here</A>.</I></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/27/the-futurist-will-human-laziness-burst-the-web-20-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EchoStar To Buy Sling Media</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/echostar-to-buy-sling-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/echostar-to-buy-sling-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[echostar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sling media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slingbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/echostar-to-buy-sling-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I love me a SlingBox. And so will millions of Dish Network subscribers if this works out like I hope it will. The satellite TV provider is buying the privately-held place-shifting wonders to the tune of a cool $380 million.
Of course, EchoStar is no stranger to partnering with smaller companies that make great products. About [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/echostar-to-buy-sling-media/13786/' rel='attachment wp-att-13786' title=''><img src='http://crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/slingbox1.jpg' alt='' /></a><br />
I love me a SlingBox. And so will millions of Dish Network subscribers if this works out like I hope it will. The satellite TV provider is buying the privately-held place-shifting wonders to the tune of a cool $380 million.</p>
<p>Of course, EchoStar is no stranger to partnering with smaller companies that make great products. About a year and a half ago they teamed up with Archos for some mobile Dish products. Nobody really noticed, but it was a good partnership.</p>
<p>Sling Media is one of those amazing smaller companies that managed to gain a footheld in the marketplace by making a useful and innovative product, and making it well. Sony may have come out with place-shifting media products first, but Sling&#8217;s were simpler, cheaper, and could be used on screens that weren&#8217;t proprietary LCDs (a move Sony has since been forced to follow.) Of course, the one thing Sling was missing was money and marketing muscle. Now they&#8217;ll have it. So unless things get really watered-down and corporate over in Sling headquarters, I&#8217;m hoping this will give more people an opportunity to watch their shows on the road. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/technology/26echo.html?_r=1&#038;ref=technology&#038;oref=slogin"><br />
via NY Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/echostar-to-buy-sling-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Is Staples &#8220;Policy&#8221; To Rip You Off With Bogus &#8220;File Conversion&#8221; Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/24/it-is-staples-policy-to-rip-you-off-with-bogus-file-conversion-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/24/it-is-staples-policy-to-rip-you-off-with-bogus-file-conversion-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/24/it-is-staples-policy-to-rip-you-off-with-bogus-file-conversion-fees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I just got back from Staples where I was faced with one of the worst examples of bogus fees I&#8217;ve ever seen. The ruse: If you have them print ANY file that is not in PDF form, they add on a $2 &#8220;Conversion Fee&#8221;, even if no file conversion takes place. It would be bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/Staples.jpg"><br />
I just got back from Staples where I was faced with one of the worst examples of bogus fees I&#8217;ve ever seen. The ruse: If you have them print ANY file that is not in PDF form, they add on a $2 &#8220;Conversion Fee&#8221;, even if no file conversion takes place. It would be bad enough if they charged a fee for something that takes a single mouse click and costs them absolutely nothing, but this is ridiculous</p>
<p>Full details and story after the jump&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-13693"></span><br />
A few days ago, I went to the Staples at 184th St and Broadway in Upper Manhattan in order to to print a simple JPEG file. The copy/print area employee gave me a price that seemed a bit high with absolutely no explanation. I asked for details on the price, and she said that they were adding a $2 &#8220;Conversion Fee&#8221; because the file was not a PDF. I told her that you don&#8217;t need to convert it to a PDF, as JPEGS are perfectly capable of being printed on their own. Even worse&#8211;She didn&#8217;t actually DO any conversion. She merely printed the JPEG from some photo program. She said there was nothing she could do, and that it was company policy. I ask to speak to the manager. He acknowledged my complaint and waives the fee.</p>
<p>Fast forward to today. I go to the same Staples for a routine print-and-fax. This time, the files I needed to print were Word (.doc) files. Unfortunately, I failed to pay proper attention, and didn&#8217;t realize that they had once again slapped on a &#8220;Conversion Fee&#8221; until I had left the store and looked at the receipt (see photo above.) </p>
<p>The problems with this are obvious:</p>
<p>1) No conversion is needed to print any of these files</p>
<p>2) No conversion actually took place to print any these files.</p>
<p>3) They do not tell you about this fee, rather tell you what the cost is and ask you to pay. If you don&#8217;t look at your receipt, you don&#8217;t know you are getting charged for it.</p>
<p>4) Even if my first two points were not true, converting files costs nothing.</p>
<p>In short, always look at your receipt, and never trust Staples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/24/it-is-staples-policy-to-rip-you-off-with-bogus-file-conversion-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creative Zen Stone Plus TravelSound Revisited: A Mea Culpa (I Admit It Rocks)</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/creative-zen-stone-plus-travelsound-revisited-a-mea-culpa-i-admit-it-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/creative-zen-stone-plus-travelsound-revisited-a-mea-culpa-i-admit-it-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/creative-zen-stone-plus-travelsound-revisited-a-mea-culpa-i-admit-it-rocks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Awhile back I put up a scathing critique of the Creative TravelSound portable speaker (the one that holds the Zen Stone Plus.) Anyway, while I stand by every single one of my criticisms as valid, I have to say I made a huge mistake: This product absolutely rocks, ESPECIALLY if you don&#8217;t own the Zen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0178.jpg" class="right"><br />
Awhile back I put up a <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/27/creative-travelsound-speakers-review/">scathing critique </a>of the Creative TravelSound portable speaker (the one that holds the Zen Stone Plus.) Anyway, while I stand by every single one of my criticisms as valid, I have to say I made a huge mistake: This product absolutely rocks, ESPECIALLY if you don&#8217;t own the Zen Stone Plus.</p>
<p>After the jump, I go over my criticisms one by one and show why, even if I was right about all of the problems, I was wrong about their effect on the overall experience in a big, big way. This is a product that really grows on you over time, and it took over a month of frequent usage for me to really begin to fall in love with it. And I have.<br />
<span id="more-13433"></span></p>
<p><strong>INCOMPATIBILITY</strong></p>
<p>Previously, I lamented the fact that these speakers seemed incompatible with anything other than the Zen Stone Plus. I was wrong on two points. First: These are designed and marketed as an accessory for that product, so they really have no obligation to make it work with any other player. And second: They DO work with virtually any other MP3 player, it&#8217;s just very, very ugly looking. </p>
<p>Using a jutting headphone jack as the plug-in method was a stroke of brilliance. After all&#8211;EVERY music device has a headphone jack. I previously speculated that the jack&#8217;s position would make it impossible to fit most MP3 players (check out the placement in the pic above). I was wrong. In fact, every player I have tried has worked (even if it hasn&#8217;t been pretty.) This includes various iPods, a Zune, and a Sandisk player. It also made me wonder why more speaker docks don&#8217;t include a pop-out or stationary headphone jack&#8211;there quite simply is no more universal way of plugging in an audio device, and it makes far more sense than having to deal with line-in holes and cables.</p>
<p><strong>BATTERIES</strong></p>
<p>I previously chastised Creative for relying on AAA batteries instead of a rechargable. I dropped the ball on this one for two reasons. First: This product is extremely cheap (just $40), and a rechargable battery would have changed that. Second: I didn&#8217;t realize before, but you don&#8217;t actually NEED the battery. Powering this thing on makes the music louder, but it still plays at a very reasonable level with no power source at all (much like earphones don&#8217;t need batteries to pump music.) This is GREAT when you are travelling: Not only do you not need to take a charger, but you don&#8217;t even need to carry batteries.</p>
<p><strong>THE REST</strong></p>
<p>I still feel the rounded bottom was a poor design decision (it is impossible to rest the speaker standing up). If the base were flat or it <STRIKE>included a fold-out kickstand</STRIKE> (We&#8217;ve been informed by a Creative rep that it DOES have a kickstand, you just need to look for it), it would be much easier to rest on a desk, and it is certainly unfortunate that the speaker blocks access to your Zen Stone Plus&#8217; power button when it is docked. But considering the price and more-than-decent sound quality, I would like to say that I am completely sold on this as a great travel companion, no matter what MP3 player you carry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/creative-zen-stone-plus-travelsound-revisited-a-mea-culpa-i-admit-it-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Futurist: Why You Should Buy Middle-End Products</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/the-futurist-why-you-should-buy-middle-end-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/the-futurist-why-you-should-buy-middle-end-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/the-futurist-why-you-should-buy-middle-end-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
About a year ago I was at a Bang &#038; Olufsen store in Manhattan. Some guy with spiky hair and a Prada jacket walked in, and asked to try out the B&#038;O A8 headphones. He put on the pair, listened to some extremely loud classical music, and, with a self-satisfied grin, said 30 seconds later [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/mshn43l.jpg" class="right"></p>
<p>About a year ago I was at a Bang &#038; Olufsen store in Manhattan. Some guy with spiky hair and a Prada jacket walked in, and asked to try out the B&#038;O A8 headphones. He put on the pair, listened to some extremely loud classical music, and, with a self-satisfied grin, said 30 seconds later say: &#8220;I&#8217;m sold. I&#8217;ll take them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now the A8s aren&#8217;t the best headphones on the market, and the B&#038;O price premium indisputably goes more towards design than performance. If I could shrink myself down Innerspace-style and enter this guy&#8217;s head, I imagine I would have not seen him processing the music he was hearing as much as the $160 price tag on the headphones (which is very, very low for a B&#038;O product) and the $30,000 price tags attached to the speakers in the same room. In fact, I would wager money that you could have shoved $20 Sonys in this guy&#8217;s ear and he wouldn&#8217;t have been able to tell the difference. What sold him was the environment, the imagery, and expensive suit on the salesperson. If you put any product in this environment and told somebody that it was premium, they would believe you. And if they are in the market for a high-end product, they might even buy it.</p>
<p><span id="more-13497"></span></p>
<p>A few days ago I was fortunate enough to visit the Bose HQ in Framingham, MA, where I was treated to an amazing presentation by Bose founder Dr. Amar Bose. As he put it, Bose was founded on the fact that audio products with supposedly-top-notch specifications were not very pleasurable to listen to. As Bose described it, the company was born when he &#8220;realized specifications A) weren’t correct as printed, and B) if you met them, the sound wasn’t improved.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whatever one&#8217;s personal feelings on Bose are, I agree with him that, for most people, specs simply don&#8217;t matter much in terms of the actual listening (or, in the case of visual products, viewing) experience. What really matters is how good an experience you are expecting. So for companies like Bose, which is held in extraordinarily high regard by the general public, high customer satisfaction levels are at least partially the result of the simple fact that customers are EXPECTING good products, often through a mix of word-of-mouth, marketing, price tags, and product design&#8211;all areas that Bose rules in. In fact, a study that came last year showed that Bose was held in higher regard by the general public than any other consumer electronics company. Higher than Apple, Microsoft, Sony, or Dell.</p>
<p>Poor products are poor products and won&#8217;t fool anybody, but the difference in sound and picture between an average product and better-than-average one is often so minute, that most people are simply incapable of noticing if they aren&#8217;t trained to do so. As Dr. Bose told me, a speaker&#8217;s ability to process ultra-high frequency ranges doesn&#8217;t matter because &#8220;we aren&#8217;t dogs.&#8221; Furthermore, I&#8217;ll give you $100 if you can tell the difference between a 10,000-to-1 contrast ratio and a 20,000-to-1 contrast ratio on a TV (hint: the spec is inherently troublesome due to it&#8217;s method of measurement, but I won&#8217;t go into that now.)</p>
<p>So my message to the public is this: Unless you&#8217;re an acoustic engineer or Mike Kobrin, save your money and buy middle-end products. Look for ones with decent reviews, don&#8217;t worry about the brand name or how glitzy the storefront is, and never, ever trust the ability of your own ears and eyes to objectively tell you what a really great product is. Instead, trust them to tell you what products you really enjoy listening to and watching. You&#8217;ll be happier that way, and might even save a few bucks.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/futurist.jpg" border="0" class="center"><br />
<i>Seth Porges writes on future technology and its role in personal electronics for his column, The Futurist. It appears every Thursday and an archive of past columns is available <A HREF=" http://www.crunchgear.com/category/the%20futurist">here</A>.</I></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/the-futurist-why-you-should-buy-middle-end-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpace Mobile Now Available For T-Mobile Sidekicks</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/myspace-mobile-now-available-for-t-mobile-sidekicks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/myspace-mobile-now-available-for-t-mobile-sidekicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/myspace-mobile-now-available-for-t-mobile-sidekicks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Through the end of October, T-Mobile will be rolling out a MySpace Mobile app for the Sidekick 3 and Sidekick ID which, as they put it, will give you a &#8220;customized, real-time MySpace experience.&#8221; Seeing as the target market for the Sidekick and the MySpace Generation are essentially one and the same, a partnership like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/myspace.gif" class="right"><br />
Through the end of October, T-Mobile will be rolling out a MySpace Mobile app for the Sidekick 3 and Sidekick ID which, as they put it, will give you a &#8220;customized, real-time MySpace experience.&#8221; Seeing as the target market for the Sidekick and the MySpace Generation are essentially one and the same, a partnership like this seems to make a ridiculous amount of sense.</p>
<p>Full release after the jump<br />
<span id="more-13498"></span></p>
<p>T-MOBILE USA AND DANGER INTRODUCE MYSPACE MOBILE</p>
<p>FOR T-MOBILE SIDEKICK</p>
<p>Always-On MySpace Mobile Platform Enables Real-Time Updates and a Custom</p>
<p>User Interface for the T-Mobile Sidekick</p>
<p>BELLEVUE, WASH./ PALO ALTO, CALIF./ LOS ANGELES—Sept. 20, 2007—T-Mobile USA, Inc., Danger, Inc., and MySpace, the country’s most trafficked Web site, today announced a highly integrated MySpace Mobile experience for the T-Mobile® Sidekick®. The announcement marks the first partnership between MySpace with T-Mobile and Danger.</p>
<p>“Sidekick users are often the hub of their circle of friends, and MySpace is the No. 1 Web site our users visit on their device,” said Jeff Hopper, vice president of marketing at T-Mobile USA. “We’ve worked closely with MySpace and Danger to create a powerful MySpace Mobile experience that is uniquely tailored for the       T-Mobile Sidekick. We think MySpace and Sidekick users are going to love having complete control over their MySpace universe right from the palm of their hand.”</p>
<p>The MySpace Mobile software is tightly integrated with the T-Mobile Sidekick hardware, user interface, and all the applications on the device. The new MySpace Mobile for the T-Mobile Sidekick is designed to optimize the delivery of data to each user and preserve the features that MySpace users love on the PC. All aspects of the MySpace Mobile experience are tailored so users can simply navigate on the T-Mobile Sidekick screen and enjoy fast access to T-Mobile’s robust wireless network.</p>
<p>“Innovating on our mobile platform is one of the most important initiatives for us,” said Amit Kapur, vice president of business development for MySpace. “Given the high degree of MySpace and Sidekick usage overlap, we know our users will be thrilled to have this optimized experience.”</p>
<p>MySpace Mobile for the T-Mobile Sidekick features include:</p>
<p>Customized User Interface (UI)</p>
<p>The new service has pertinent information including new messages, friend requests and comments located in one easy-to-navigate home screen. To use other aspects of the service, users simply navigate through the four main sections of the application: Home, MyMail, Blog, and Search. The Sidekick’s directional pad allows users to jump easily from each activity without waiting for a page to load.</p>
<p>Real-time Updates</p>
<p>MySpace Mobile users can stay signed in to MySpace even when they are on the go with their T-Mobile Sidekick. Real-time features include:</p>
<p>·       Profile editing, which allows users to edit their MySpace profile directly from the MySpace application, quickly and easily, wherever they are. Profile updates are immediately reflected on the MySpace Web site.</p>
<p>·       Optimized photo management, which empowers users to — with the click of a button — upload photos with captions from their T-Mobile Sidekick photo galleries, directly to MySpace.</p>
<p>·       Full-featured MySpace messaging, including push content and notifications powered by the Danger service. The service automatically pushes content, such as new friend requests or new messages, to the end user, meaning that users are notified of new MySpace activity even when they are using other T-Mobile Sidekick applications. This changes the interaction paradigm from request/ response (as it is via the browser today) to real-time, push messaging.</p>
<p>·       The application will provide “Online Now” status for a user’s friends who are online, further advancing the “always-on” model.</p>
<p>·       Users can read, reply to or post comments to the profiles and photos of friends, as well as read and reply to comments on their own profiles.</p>
<p>Iconic Sidekick design</p>
<p>Customers consider the T-Mobile Sidekick a social lifeline and a messaging powerhouse thanks to intuitive features such as a large color screen, full QWERTY keyboard, and a host of communications capabilities including instant messaging and Web browsing.</p>
<p>The MySpace Mobile service is made possible on the T-Mobile Sidekick through two components. The first component is the client software, being made available for download in a staged rollout to the T-Mobile Sidekick user base throughout the next several weeks. The second component is the service that powers the application. Danger has created a private interconnection to MySpace, whereby each user can access all of his or her account data and interact with friends in real time.</p>
<p>“The first phase of Danger’s product evolution focused on providing a rich mobile messaging experience, as part of the overall Internet offering,” said Henry R. (Hank) Nothhaft, CEO and Chairman of Danger, Inc. “The new MySpace Mobile for Sidekick showcases the next stage of our evolution, tapping directly into compelling Web-based content and real-time information services and delivering them in an uncompromised fashion to mobile consumers.”</p>
<p>This week, T-Mobile will begin a multi-week rollout of the new application to T-Mobile Sidekick users. T-Mobile customers can access and subscribe to the service through the Download Catalog. The new service will be available to all Sidekick iD and Sidekick 3 users by the end of October. For more information about the      T-Mobile Sidekick, please visit www.sidekick.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/20/myspace-mobile-now-available-for-t-mobile-sidekicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. Bose Tells All: Company Secrets, Why They Don&#8217;t Publish Specs, And More</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/19/dr-bose-tells-all-company-sercrets-why-they-dont-publish-specs-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/19/dr-bose-tells-all-company-sercrets-why-they-dont-publish-specs-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/19/dr-bose-tells-all-company-sercrets-why-they-dont-publish-specs-and-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The mysterious, elusive, and admittedly obsessive Dr. Amar Bose, founder and namesake of the Bose Corporation, made a rare appearance Tuesday to a select group of journalists. The occasion was the launch of their new Bose Computer MusicMonitor speakers, but the real treat was hearing the good doctor dish out secrets about the history of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/000_0029.jpg" class="right"></p>
<p>The mysterious, elusive, and admittedly obsessive Dr. Amar Bose, founder and namesake of the Bose Corporation, made a rare appearance Tuesday to a select group of journalists. The occasion was the launch of their new Bose Computer MusicMonitor speakers, but the real treat was hearing the good doctor dish out secrets about the history of Bose, why they almost went bankrupt, and why they never, ever publish specifications for any of their products. As he put it, he spoke to us about “things never discussed outside the company, things that only people involved in the beginning know.”</p>
<p>Some of the words may be paraphrased a bit (I wrote this quickly as he spoke), and I cut out some of the fat, but for the most part, the following is straight from the mouth of Dr. Bose.</p>
<p><strong>THE ORIGIN STORY: AN OBSESSION IS BORN</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I was doing my doctorate at M.I.T. I was a disciplined student. I only allowed myself to listen to classical music. Then I started writing pieces and I didn&#8217;t need as much concentration, so I thought I could go out and buy a HiFi sound system.</p>
<p>I went and checked the specifications. Like all engineers, I thought specifications meant everything. I believed that thoroughly. I had been brainwashed for years&#8230;</p>
<p><em>His story continues after the jump&#8230;</em><br />
<span id="more-13432"></span></p>
<p>I went to Radioshack. There were only two of them around at the time. I wasn&#8217;t interested in listening. I thought specifications were dominant, so I bought the system with the best specifications. I brought the system home to my room. I brought records home and I never was able to play more than three or four minutes of a record to the people there. I looked at the faces around at me as I played it, especially those who studied opera, and they had their own reactions. Oh my god it was embarassing! Something had gone wrong!</p>
<p>I went back to Radioshack and returned the system. I could hardly finish writing my doctorate thesis on mathematician Norbert Weiner.</p>
<p>Skipping ahead a little bit. I decided I woud like to test loudspeakers in our chamber. At that time, I had no interest in acoustics. My field was a different field at the time. But this became a problem that began to obsess me: How could something measure so well and not sound good?</p>
<p>I made a relationship with the Vice President of Radioshack. I said: “Look. At M.I.T. We would like to test different speakers. Could I make an arrangement with you where I borrow different speakers and test them and you can have the results?” </p>
<p>Anyway, much to my shock, none of the loudspeakers had close to what was published. College kids today think that industry is big and bad and money is the only thing that counts. I&#8217;m afraid that may be true. I thought it was just industry that was causing all these problems. So I began to contact people in the industry, and asked why the measurements weren&#8217;t the same as what was published. I got back a statement saying the measuring was wrong&#8230;.</p>
<p>So then the question was: What to do? I realized specifications A) weren&#8217;t correct as printed, and B) if you met them, the sound wasn&#8217;t improved. </p>
<p>I brought students and asked them which speakers they thought were best. Then I brought in the same students six months later, and found the results were totally random, and not the same. So I figured we needed to bring in musicians. So we brought in musicians from the Boston Symphony Orchestra. We found the same thing: The results were random. </p>
<p>That really threw us back. We just about bailed on research. If you can&#8217;t have musicians know which sound was better than another sound, how can you design a system? If a person can&#8217;t tell, what can you do? So we launched an enormous program at M.I.T., and slowly learned more about it.</p>
<p><strong>A COMPANY IS BORN</strong></p>
<p>The company was formed in 1964. There were problems dealing with different spaces and different rooms. In the first Bose product, for the first time there was active equalization. Back then, the speaker was a sacred thing: You didn&#8217;t mess with the sound before it entered the loudspeaker. </p>
<p>When we came out with our first speaker, the 901, we lost the first president of the company, a longtime friend of mine. He said: You &#8216;re going to introduce this thing, I don&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s better than anything on the the market. Nobody is going to buy this. It&#8217;s got no woofer, no tweeters. Just full range loudspekaers. He said he would leave if we released it, and he did.</p>
<p>When we launched that one it caused quite a stir in the industry because it had no woofers and no tweeters and worse yet, eight of the those full-range drivers were facing back agains the wall, with one facing forward. Imagine this in a community of people who still believe in measurements. They didn&#8217;t know how to measure it. They measured it in a chamber with a microphone in front, so 80 percent of the sound went away from the microphone!</p>
<p><strong>BANKRUPTCY</strong></p>
<p>It had some really interesting reviews. One magazine in the United States, a really credible magazine, had one reviewer named Norman Eisenburg who really knew his music. In those days I used to take the loudspeaker to the reviewer. I packed my son and loudspeaker in the car and went off. I put this little thing on top of the big speakers he had, turned it on, and within five minutes he said: “I don&#8217;t care if this is made of green cheese, it&#8217;s the best sound, most accurate sound, I&#8217;ve ever heard.”</p>
<p>He came out with a review titled “Surround and Conquer.” He was not known to do things like that. Everybody in the press knew he knew music, and it resulted in rave reviews one after another, and we were able to survive.</p>
<p>Then came one devastating review from a leading magazine. <em>[WRITERS NOTE: He is likely referring to Consumer REports]</em>. I&#8217;m talking 1960s, 1970s. It claimed that the Bose loudspekaer, the 901, caused violins to wander about the living room, and said a few other devastating things&#8230; They said it was outperformed by a $27.50 Japanese speaker sold at Radioshack. They said if you must buy this Bose speaker, buy the little Japanese speaker and use it as a tweeter. </p>
<p>So that bankrupted us. <em>[Writer's note: I just got a note from Bose PR informing me that they never, in fact, went bankrupt. Either Dr. Bose misspoke or I misheard him.]</p>
<p>We had 37 people at the time. I gathered them in one room and said: “If we don&#8217;t do anything, it will probably kill us. But if we do something, we have no credibility since we&#8217;re just a small company and we can&#8217;t do anything against this.” I said I think we oughtta do something. I wanted a vote. It was unanimous in favor of taking action. Little did we know it would take 14 years to go through the legal process. The first federal court we won. The appelate level we lost. The Supreme Court level vote was 5-4 against us, but said in there that everything stated in the magazine about the product was false. However, freedom of speech protects that.</p>
<p>However, in that process of 14 years, as troublesome and many headaches as it generated, we made it known to the public that this thing was going on. That they should come hear the product and see the sound &#8216;wander&#8217; through the room. A judge asked “Where did the violins wander to?” Said: “Right over the wall and over the ceilling?” The judge was an Italian judge and he really knew music. That might have contributed to winning the first level of the case.</p>
<p><strong>BACKLASH</strong></p>
<p>We went through all that and finally put the speaker, the 901, on the market. Then bumped into another problem. If I hadn&#8217;t been so naïve about what goes on in business, I would have expected this. There were five companies that were major in the speaker business at the time. They had a meeting to figure out: What can we do to stop Bose? We know this because later on we hired a person who was very bright person who was hired by the companies and sent to this meeting.</p>
<p>As a result of the meeting, they come out with a white paper on the Bose 901 and what was wrong with it. Out of the five companies, in the first year we got four of the papers. The fifth one was so liable that the rep held onto the paper while reading it to dealers. We never got it, but got the content from dealers.</p>
<p>These are all things that, for an academic person, were shocking. I thought: “I brought top notch engineers into the company and I brought them into a sewer.”</p>
<p><strong>WHY THEY NEVER PUBLISH SPECS</strong></p>
<p>I decided on a philosophy at the time. We would cut out specifications because of two reasons. We decided to make each product that came out superior to what was out at the time. If it was superior, the public would appreciate it. That&#8217;s why we don&#8217;t give any measurements on any product today. </p>
<p>There are two reasons we cut out the specifications:<br />
1) We don&#8217;t know of any measurements that actually determine anything about a product, and 2) Measurements are phony, in general, as they are printed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/19/dr-bose-tells-all-company-sercrets-why-they-dont-publish-specs-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak EasyShare V1253 (The First High-Def Pocketcam) Quick Look</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/14/kodak-easyshare-v1253-the-first-high-def-pocketcam-quick-look/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/14/kodak-easyshare-v1253-the-first-high-def-pocketcam-quick-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/14/kodak-easyshare-v1253-the-first-high-def-pocketcam-quick-look/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The promise of the Kodak&#8217;s EasyShare V1253 is immense. As the world&#8217;s first compact cam with a video capture function that can pull high-def (that&#8217;s 720p, and no I&#8217;m not counting those Sanyo products), this could represent a rare case of digital convergence that carves out an entirely new niche. 
We just got our hands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0546.jpg" class="center" ></p>
<p>The promise of the Kodak&#8217;s EasyShare V1253 is immense. As the world&#8217;s first compact cam with a video capture function that can pull high-def (that&#8217;s 720p, and no I&#8217;m not counting those Sanyo products), this could represent a rare case of digital convergence that carves out an entirely new niche. </p>
<p>We just got our hands on this pore-revealing pocket shooter. A full review will come later, but here&#8217;s some pics and a quick overview.</p>
<p><span id="more-13136"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0538.jpg" class="center" ></p>
<p>While this 3x-optical-zooming camera shoots 12 megapixels&mdash;way more than anybody not in the poster business would actually need&mdash;the real story is the video function. Along with the simultaneously-released V1233 (which is bulkier and thus not quite as awesome), this thing can capture 720p video at 30 frames per second. Once we put it through the ringer, lets see if it lives up to its promise.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0540.jpg" class="center" ></p>
<p>It&#8217;s got a very-necessary digital image stabilization, but I&#8217;d imagine high-def tremors will be unavoidable from something this small.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0544.jpg"></p>
<p>The camera is a bit bulky for a compact cam (especially next to Casio and Sony&#8217;s offerings), but it will still stow nicely in a purse or pouch. It also requires a proprietary adapter in order to plug a U.S.B. cord into it, which is obnoxious. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0547.jpg"></p>
<p>At 3.1-inches, the rear L.C.D. screen is absolutely enormous. There&#8217;s no optical viewfinder&mdash;so be warned&mdash;but the colorful screen should keep most pupils happy.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0548.jpg"></p>
<p>It retails for $300, and should be available now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/14/kodak-easyshare-v1253-the-first-high-def-pocketcam-quick-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Futurist: Why Apple&#8217;s Good Products Are Bad For Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/13/the-futurist-why-apples-good-products-are-bad-for-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/13/the-futurist-why-apples-good-products-are-bad-for-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/13/the-futurist-why-apples-good-products-are-bad-for-innovation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Few&#8212;rather, no other&#8212;companies stir up the same fool&#8217;s game of me-too as Apple. I feel sort of ridiculous saying it, and perhaps sound like a bit of a fanboy, but Apple makes products that work in ways most CE products don&#8217;t. When playing with an iPod or iPhone, it&#8217;s almost easy to take for granted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/jobsipod.jpg" class="right"><br />
Few&mdash;rather, no other&mdash;companies stir up the same fool&#8217;s game of me-too as Apple. I feel sort of ridiculous saying it, and perhaps sound like a bit of a fanboy, but Apple makes products that work in ways most CE products don&#8217;t. When playing with an iPod or iPhone, it&#8217;s almost easy to take for granted the fact that most things we buy just aren&#8217;t user-friendly.  A top exec at Research In Motion (that would be the guys who make BlackBerrys) told me a few months back that about 30 percent of Windows Mobile phones were returned&#8211;presumably because their buyers are so frustrated with their atrocious battery life/molassis-slow processors/impossible-to-navigate GUI/propensity to freeze. I&#8217;m not sure how many iPhone buyers are returning their gadgets in frustration, but I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s a statistically insignificant number.</p>
<p>In general, as the cliche goes, Apple products are known for being simple, pretty, easy-to-use, and fun. And this is exactly why they are bad for progress in the tech world.</p>
<p><span id="more-13117"></span></p>
<p>While Apple&#8217;s gadgets are undoubtedly user friendly, that ease-of-use always comes at a price. In this case, it is a stinginess with features&mdash;video had been around on PMPs for years before the 5G iPod brought it to the masses, and no iPod has yet to include an FM reciever or voice recorder. For the most part, the mass market gets by just fine without such add-ons, as long as a product&#8217;s core functionality shines. Unfortunately, all too often, other companies try to mimick this, and end up producing under-powered Apple rip-offs that lack any sense of innovation or experimentation. Unfortunately, many companies seem to have confused &#8220;simple&#8221; with &#8220;feature-less.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ever since the iPod burst onto the scene, Creative, SanDisk, Archos, Microsoft, and all their other DAP-making brethren have attempted to beat Apple by giving consumers more features for less money. It obviously hasn&#8217;t worked, and the obvious response is &#8220;Why even bother?&#8221; To these companies, it must look like no matter how many bells and whistles they stuff in their players, they just can&#8217;t win. In fact, it may be that they can&#8217;t, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the public doesn&#8217;t win by them trying.</p>
<p>These players represent a sort of farm league for features. A typical feature cycle goes like this: A new feature pops up on one of their players, gets put through the ringer while the technology gets better, and eventually shows up on an Apple product, to much hoopla, when they are ready for prime time. In the end, Apple usually gets credit for the development of the feature, even though such credit is beyond ridiculous.</p>
<p>Still, this farm league is necessary for the progress of innovation&mdash;particularly as it concerns mobile gadgets. Without it, we&#8217;d likely be stuck with the same stale players for years.</p>
<p>So this is a call to all the Archoses and Creatives of the world: Don&#8217;t despair. Keep putting on tons of features that nobody uses. Even if they don&#8217;t boost your sales one iota, you are providing a valuable service to everybody who wants great features. And don&#8217;t worry about following Apple&#8217;s lead&mdash;leave that to Chinese iPhone cloners. Instead, worry about carving out your own niche. One day, you just might find that that niche is suddenly the mass market.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/futurist.jpg" border="0" class="center"><br />
<i>Seth Porges writes on future technology and its role in personal electronics for his column, The Futurist. It appears every Thursday and an archive of past columns is available <A HREF=" http://www.crunchgear.com/category/the%20futurist">here</A>.</I></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/13/the-futurist-why-apples-good-products-are-bad-for-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back To School 2007: The Best Cheap Laptops</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/11/back-to-school-2007-the-best-cheap-laptops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/11/back-to-school-2007-the-best-cheap-laptops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/11/back-to-school-2007-the-best-cheap-laptops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There is no more archetypal a small living space than a college dorm. Sure, us New Yorkers have to deal with closet-sized apartments, but next to the squalor of a freshman quad, crashing in the Lowest East Side is living in luxury. Such cramped conditions call for thin and light gadgets. When I was in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/lecture_laptops.jpg" class="right"><br />
There is no more archetypal a small living space than a college dorm. Sure, us New Yorkers have to deal with closet-sized apartments, but next to the squalor of a freshman quad, crashing in the Lowest East Side is living in luxury. Such cramped conditions call for thin and light gadgets. When I was in college, I made the mistake of lugging a mini-tower to my dorm. Big mistake. A laptop not only takes up less precious mini-fridge space, but it can be hauled to classes for mid-lecture notetaking, Minesweeper-playing, and Facebook-squatting. And college campuses are custom-made for the devices. These days, the hallowed halls of higher education are some of the most wired corridors on Earth.</p>
<p>So, here we go. The best cheap laptops for toting to campus. With one exception, we&#8217;ve stuck to machines that start at under a grand. After all, college kids are poor and break and lose things. Of course, since virtually all laptops are customizable, all prices are approximate &mdash; a few extra gigs of memory or a sweet new HD-DVD drive will boost any price.</p>
<p><span id="more-12922"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/macbook.jpg" class="right"><br />
<strong><A HREF="http://www.apple.com">MacBook: The &#8220;Duh&#8221; Pick</A></strong></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need me to tell you about this one, but Apple makes it simple. The 13-inch MacBook is ridiculously easy to tote, pretty as hell, and shines with just about everything that matters to college kids&mdash;movies, music, media editing. Of course, Macs were never known for their games, so get Parallels or Boot Camp if your fragging fingers are feeling frisky. And while it might cost a bit more than a comparably-powered Windows machine (and is the only machine we are featuring with a sticker that tops a grand), a Mac is a virtual vaccination that will keep you free of viruses, which spread through campus computers faster than mono at DTD.<br />
<em>Starts at about $1099</em></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/dell.gif" class="right"><br />
<strong><br />
<A HREF="http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/inspnnb_1420?c=us&#038;cs=19&#038;l=en&#038;s=dhs">Dell Inspiron 1420</A>: For the Color-Conscience</strong><br />
I still don&#8217;t get why people make such a big deal over what color a gadget comes in. But they do, and if you are one of those people, while i won&#8217;t pretend to understand what goes through your mind, I will recommend this computer. After all, one of its eight available colors is sure to make you happy. On a more technical note, this computer is a pretty damned good deal. Most configurations clock in under a grand, and it comes with a healthy 160GB hard drive, 2-to-4 gigs of RAM, an okay-sized 14.-inch monitor, and a I-guess-it&#8217;s-now-standard Core 2 Duo processor. Also neat: For about 150 more clams, you can get it preloaded with 3G broadband from any of the non-T-Mobile carriers who offer such surfing services. And at 5.9 lbs, you&#8217;ll feel it, but it won&#8217;t keep you from carrying your psych books either.<br />
<em>About $850</em></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/AcerAspire47106i.jpg" class="right"><br />
<strong><a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/Review/Acer-Aspire-4710-2013.htm">Acer Aspire 4710-2013</a>: For The Savvy Shopper</strong></p>
<p>For the cost of a pre-price-cut iPhone, you can get a pretty sweet CPU. I&#8217;ve played around with some of Acer&#8217;s new laptops a bit and, other than the sheer heft of their up-scale multimedia offerings, have been seriously impressed. Their designs have improved like crazy (this model got some input in that department from BMW Group Designworks USA, although it still doesn&#8217;t feature cup holders), and their machines have become incredible values. For just $600, you can get a Core 2 Duo processor, 8x DVD burner on a nice-looking 14.1-inch model. For the money, I&#8217;d reckon to say this machine can&#8217;t be beat.<br />
<em>About $599</em></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/toshiba.jpg" class="right"><br />
<strong><br />
<a href="http://www.toshibadirect.com/td/b2c/pdet.to?poid=368658">Toshiba Satellite P205-S6237</a>: Bonkers For Big Screens</strong></p>
<p>Campus networks are great for sucking up multi-gigabyte flicks. Unfortunately, a small screen means you have to rest the laptop on your body, potentially killing future unborn children from hot drives and seriously cramping your style (and ability to share the silver screen.) This model gives you a 17-inch screen and more-powerful-than-expected speakers for under a grand &mdash; a rarity in the computer world. I&#8217;ve heard less-than-stellar reports on the system&#8217;s benchmarking and battery life, and it doesn&#8217;t approach Toshiba&#8217;s upmarket Qosmio&#8217;s in terms of multimedia prowess, but it also won&#8217;t rape your wallet like it&#8217;s big brother.<br />
<em>About $900</em></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/Everex.jpg" class="right"><br />
<strong>Everex StepNote SA2053T: The Ultra-cheap Ultraportable</strong></p>
<p>Most ultraportable notebooks are ultra expensive. The fact is, cutting heft usually comes at a hefty price. Shave off the weight and the cost by picking up this notebook. At just 3.8lbs, you&#8217;ll have no trouble running between lectures with this in your bag. Under the hood, things don&#8217;t look so bad either. It&#8217;s got a 1.73-GHz Core Duo processor, a 100-gig hard drive. and a DVD burner. And who the hell is Everex? I&#8217;m not too sure, but if they keep pumping out machines like this, they could turn themselves into the Vizio of notebooks. And notice the <em>Wild Hogs</em> screenshot. Maybe these guys hang out with Steve Jobs.<br />
<em>About $680</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/11/back-to-school-2007-the-best-cheap-laptops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Steve Jobs Sick Of The Cell Phone Industry Already?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/09/is-steve-jobs-sick-of-the-cell-phone-industry-already/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/09/is-steve-jobs-sick-of-the-cell-phone-industry-already/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/09/is-steve-jobs-sick-of-the-cell-phone-industry-already/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I haven&#8217;t been privy to the private conversations of Steve Jobs, but listening to his keynote the other day, it&#8217;s difficult not to pick up on at least some antipathy the man seems to hold towards the entire mobile phone industry. 
&#8220;Steve Jobs’ entire keynote was a series of middle fingers directed at AT&#038;T and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/jobswithipod1.jpg" class="right"><br />
I haven&#8217;t been privy to the private conversations of Steve Jobs, but listening to his keynote the other day, it&#8217;s difficult not to pick up on at least some antipathy the man seems to hold towards the entire mobile phone industry. </p>
<p>&#8220;Steve Jobs’ entire keynote was a series of middle fingers directed at AT&#038;T and their carrier brethren,&#8221; says Sascha Segan, lead cell phone and PDA analyst at PC Magazine. &#8220;Notice that he dropped the iPhone’s price without mentioning AT&#038;T; that he’s introducing the iPod Touch into Europe before the iPhone, which will depress iPhone sales there; and that he had a long chat with a Starbucks exec without once mentioning T-Mobile, who operate all of the Starbucks hotspots that he’ll be selling his music through. Never mind that the song he decided to demo on the iPod Touch was Beck’s &#8216;Cellphone’s Dead.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps he is merely sharing the frustrations of millions of Americans fed up with carrier-locked phones, draconian contracts, poor customer service, and ludicrous fees, but it would appear that, a little more than two months after bringing Apple into the cell phone game, he is already sick of it.</p>
<p>Click the jump to read more&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-12767"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;The very existence of the i-minus-phone, the Touch, is a slam at AT&#038;T,&#8221; Segan adds. &#8220;AT&#038;T was hoping that they’d get customers to come over from other carriers for the ability to use Apple’s radical new product. Now Apple’s offering an option for all of those Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile users, who now don’t have to switch to AT&#038;T – they can get their Touch and keep their existing phones. The phone is the weakest part of the iPhone anyway.&#8221;</p>
<p>Add to the list the fact that the iPod Touch will be available in a 16-gig version while the iPhone still maxes out at 8, and I couldn&#8217;t agree with Sascha more. It&#8217;s almost like he thought: &#8220;Carriers: I hate you. Customers: Here&#8217;s the iPhone without having to deal with them, and an extra 8-gigs of memory to play with while you&#8217;re at it.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I said&#8211;I&#8217;m not sure what kind of backroom wheelings and dealing Jobs has had with AT&#038;T, but I would bet money that they have been littered with frustration and tension. I would also bet that Steve has the date his exclusivity agreement with AT&#038;T expires circled on his calendar. I think it goes without saying that he can&#8217;t wait to open up his toy to the rest of the country, not to mention the rest of the world, where customers are free to pick whatever phone they want, no matter who they choose to pay their monthly bill to. While few electronics companies are as American as Apple, perhaps Jobs&#8217; mentality would find itself a better fit in Europe or Asia. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/09/is-steve-jobs-sick-of-the-cell-phone-industry-already/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola To Spread Self Thin, Promises New Products Next Month</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/08/motorola-to-spread-self-thin-promises-new-products-next-month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/08/motorola-to-spread-self-thin-promises-new-products-next-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/08/motorola-to-spread-self-thin-promises-new-products-next-month/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Over at the Times, they&#8217;re reporting that, in a rare admission of defeat, Motorola is acknowledging a deep slump stemming from their oft-reported inability to follow-up on the ridiculous success of a certain ubiquitous handset. Their response: &#8220;introducing a series of innovative new cellphones rather than a &#8216;one-hit wonder&#8217; like the RAZR.&#8221;

This is a sound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/razr.jpg" class="right"><br />
Over at the <em>Times</em>, they&#8217;re reporting that, in a rare admission of defeat, Motorola is acknowledging a deep slump stemming from their oft-reported inability to follow-up on the ridiculous success of a certain ubiquitous handset. Their response: &#8220;introducing a series of innovative new cellphones rather than a &#8216;one-hit wonder&#8217; like the RAZR.&#8221;<br />
<span id="more-12783"></span><br />
This is a sound enough strategy, and I applaud it. Any investor will tell you never to put too many of your eggs in one basket, and I&#8217;m constantly irritated at the lack of innovation in CE that stems from companies refusing to take any risks with new products, and instead relying on knocking-off or incrementally improving proven advances. The fact is, even though we&#8217;ll always have our share of ultra-hyped iPhones, the biggest hits and paradigm-shifters are often complete surprises. </p>
<p>And since they apparently have some new product announcements lined up for next month, lets just hope their idea of &#8220;innovative new cellphones&#8221; doesn&#8217;t involve simply plastering the RAZR with new coats of paint.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/08/technology/08motorola.html?_r=1&#038;ref=technology&#038;oref=slogin">NYTimes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/08/motorola-to-spread-self-thin-promises-new-products-next-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shot Of Wii Wheel For Sale In The Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/07/shot-of-wii-wheel-for-sale-in-the-wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/07/shot-of-wii-wheel-for-sale-in-the-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/07/shot-of-wii-wheel-for-sale-in-the-wild/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The official line from Nintendo is that the Wii Wheel steering wheel accessory will be available in the beginning of 2008, along with the Wii version of Mario Kart. However, I just got back from Europe, where I happened to spot that very product for sale in an electronics store within the Amsterdam airport for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/DSC_0335-1.jpg"></p>
<p>The official line from Nintendo is that the Wii Wheel steering wheel accessory will be available in the beginning of 2008, along with the Wii version of Mario Kart. However, I just got back from Europe, where I happened to spot that very product for sale in an electronics store within the Amsterdam airport for 20 Euros, or about $26. Check it out.</p>
<p>And if your first thought is &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s a third-party knock-off&#8221;, then I ask you to check out the official-(looking) Nintendo logos on the bottom corners of the box. They don&#8217;t do it like that on Canal Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/07/shot-of-wii-wheel-for-sale-in-the-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Futurist: Analyzing Apple&#8217;s Announcements</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/06/the-futurist-analyzing-apples-announcements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/06/the-futurist-analyzing-apples-announcements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/06/the-futurist-analyzing-apples-announcements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Another day, another Apple announcement. Fortunately, this was no &#8220;Lets take another look at Leopard&#8221; letdown. As far as product unveilings go, this one was absolutely a doozy. We saw them (almost) completely revamp the entire iPod line, add a new (but still familiar) face to the mix, and bring frowns to the faces of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/jobswithipod1.jpg" class="right"></p>
<p>Another day, another Apple announcement. Fortunately, this was no &#8220;Lets take another look at Leopard&#8221; letdown. As far as product unveilings go, this one was absolutely a doozy. We saw them (almost) completely revamp the entire iPod line, add a new (but still familiar) face to the mix, and bring frowns to the faces of Sony and HP, who had the misfortune of announcing products on the same day.</p>
<p>So lets take a look at what some of what they&#8217;ve done, and what it all means:<br />
<span id="more-12642"></span><br />
<strong>JUST 99 CENTS FOR A RINGTONE!!!:</strong></p>
<p>Note to Steve Jobs/Apple, Inc.: Your press conference attendees are a pretty friendly bunch. At most press conferences, if journalists broke out in applause every time a new slide came on the screen, media watchdogs would go &#8220;Oh no they didn&#8217;t!&#8221; But with you, it&#8217;s okay. You see: The journalists who cover you are just, as if not more, passionate about this whole technology thing than anybody out there. So when a legitimately great piece of technology comes out of Cupertino or anywhere else , it may be somewhat understandable if they can&#8217;t help themselves but applaud like Yoda just came on-screen for the first time during an <em>Empire</em> screening.</p>
<p>But we also recognize the smell of corporate hubris and grossness when it starts to waft through the hall. Just a few months ago, you said that the digital music industry should abandon DRM completely. To now engage in the very worst of all DRM crimes: double charging (that is, forcing consumers to buy the same thing twice in order to work on multiple devices), you are embracing everything that we hate about DRM. Shame.</p>
<p><strong>IT&#8217;S FOR A GOOD CAUSE:</strong></p>
<p>Ah, what&#8217;s there to say? I&#8217;m sure the Apple engineers were busy enough with the thousands of other goings-on that they figured they could get away with slapping a coat of red paint on a Shuffle and calling it a day. And really, what&#8217;s wrong with that? A good Shuffle in white should be a good Shuffle in red.</p>
<p><strong>THE 3G NANO:</strong></p>
<p>The words of the immortal &#8220;Weird&#8221; Al Yankovic come to mind:</p>
<p>&#8220;My zippers bust, my buckles break<br />
I&#8217;m too much man for you to take<br />
The pavement cracks when I fall down<br />
I&#8217;ve got more chins than Chinatown&#8230;</p>
<p>Because I&#8217;m fat, I&#8217;m fat, come on<br />
You know I&#8217;m fat, I&#8217;m fat, you know it<br />
You know I&#8217;m fat, I&#8217;m fat, come on you know<br />
Don&#8217;t call me pudgy, portly, or stout<br />
Just now tell me once again who&#8217;s fat.&#8221;</p>
<p>The lack of video on the Nano was merely a product of Apple&#8217;s design. Smaller, crappier, less-powerful MP3 players than the Nano have been playing video for years. Still, you have to give them credit for not stuffing the moving image on anything with a screen &mdash; video capabilities on tiny, poor-resolution screens are rarely used, and often cause more harm than good. They waited until they had a super bright screen, decent-sized screen, so good for them.</p>
<p><strong>THE iPOD &#8220;CLASSIC&#8221;:</strong></p>
<p>Are we already nostalgic for 2005, when the 5G iPod first tore up the cover of Time magazine and ushered in a new era of portable video? These days, tech product names tend to evoke futuristic feelings of sleekness and bleeding-edgness. When I hear the word &#8220;Classic&#8221;, I imagine a gas-guzzling Chevy that weighs three tons and can&#8217;t fit down the streets of downtown Boston. Seriously, it is almost like they don&#8217;t want this thing to succeed. Maybe there&#8217;s more profit in the flash players than this (I honestly don&#8217;t know), or maybe the presence of four players plus a phone is too muchiPod for Apple to handle, but you have to imagine that somebody in Cupertino was trying to sink this player before it got off the ground.</p>
<p>Still, there is definitely a market for people who desire ginormous hard drives to stick gargantuan amounts of music they&#8217;ll never listen to on. I, for one, hate shuffling songs on and off my player as it fills up. Glad to see this addressed.</p>
<p><strong>DO YOU WANNA TOUCH? (YEAH!):</strong></p>
<p>Add Skype and the new Touch is the best iPhone out there. Seriously though: Very good. Very, very good. There is surely a gigantic swath of people out there who desire the browsing, video, and music of the iPhone, but don&#8217;t really feel like cutting their T-Mobile contract and signing their life away to AT&#038;T. And because of the inability for non-hackers to get an unactivated iPhone to do anything but keep papers from blowing away, there was simply no getting around it.</p>
<p>A few things though&#8230;<br />
The normal time periods for carrier exclusivity for hot new phones run in 6 month intervals. So it could be 6 months, or a year, or two years. You get the point. Well, the iPhone was announced pretty much exactly 6 months ago (even if it didn&#8217;t hit until much later.) I would bet money that Apple had this product ready to roll months ago, and AT&#038;T likely pulled all their cards (and cash) in order to give them a few months of exclusivity with the iPhone before a strikingly-similar product such as this became available.</p>
<p>Adding ammo to this theory is the fact that the iPod Touch is rolling out WORLDWIDE in a few weeks, meaning it could likely come out in other countries where no such carrier shenanigans exist around the same time as the iPhone.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d say it is pretty much a sure thing that a 16 gig version of the iPhone is just&#8230; around&#8230; the&#8230; corner&#8230; (although we&#8217;ll honestly probably have to wait until MacWorld, or at least until they unload all the clearance stock of the 4 gig version.)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/futurist.jpg" border="0" class="center"><br />
<i>Seth Porges writes on future technology and its role in personal electronics for his column, The Futurist. It appears every Thursday and an archive of past columns is available <A HREF=" http://www.crunchgear.com/category/the%20futurist">here</A>.</I></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/06/the-futurist-analyzing-apples-announcements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New American-ized Nokia N-95 Vs. Old N-95: Hands On, Side-By-Side</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Nokia just announced a new American-ized N-95 (the one on the right side in the photo). The big deal is that it is optimized to latch onto our GSM 3G networks, so you can get your HSDPA or EDGE on stateside (it does the dance with both AT&#038;T and T-Mobile.) It also has a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/dsc_0284.JPG' alt='dsc_0284.JPG' /></p>
<p>Nokia just announced a new American-ized N-95 (the one on the right side in the photo). The big deal is that it is optimized to latch onto our GSM 3G networks, so you can get your HSDPA or EDGE on stateside (it does the dance with both AT&#038;T and T-Mobile.) It also has a few cosmetic changes&mdash;like the camera lens, as you can see. It&#8217;ll hit the states in September, and the price is an iPhone-esque $699 (mainly because it&#8217;ll only be sold unlocked, without carrier subsidies.)</p>
<p>Click the jump to see more side-by-side of these two cross-continental twins. </p>
<p><span id="more-12214"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/pbucket/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Futurist: The N-Gage Lives! But Can It Survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/the-futurist-the-n-gage-lives-but-can-it-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/the-futurist-the-n-gage-lives-but-can-it-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/the-futurist-the-n-gage-lives-but-can-it-survive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In hindsight, the original N-Gage was doomed from the start. It&#8217;s games were simply spectacular for a mobile phone, but the device itself was bulky, had a pretty small screen, and looked more like a Choco Taco than either a phone or gaming handheld. A Nokia executive today said that they feel a company needs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28429352@N00/1266161488/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1435/1266161488_14f53cbf08.jpg" width="500" height="332" alt="Ngage"  class="center" /></a><br />
In hindsight, the original N-Gage was doomed from the start. It&#8217;s games were simply spectacular for a mobile phone, but the device itself was bulky, had a pretty small screen, and looked more like a Choco Taco than either a phone or gaming handheld. A Nokia executive today said that they feel a company needs to ship 6 million devices in order to create a financially sustainable gaming ecosystem. Worldwide, Finland pushed 3 million of the tacos, leaving them far short of their goals</p>
<p>Still, the N-Gage, which was always more popular overseas than in the US, never really died. It&#8217;s had a sustained presence at trade shows and, remarkably, N-Gage Arena, the device&#8217;s online gaming platform, has been continuously running the whole time.<br />
<span id="more-12202"></span><br />
&#8220;We&#8217;re just really dedicated to gaming,&#8221; Gregg Sauter, Nokia&#8217;s Director of Games Publishing told me. &#8220;Look at the value of the games businesss &mdash; it&#8217;s a 30 billion dollar business. If you look at where money and margins are, this is big time entertainment.&#8221;</p>
<p>So how does Nokia intend to turn N-Gage &mdash; the little mobile platform that refused to die&#8211;into the dominant mobile phone-based gaming platform?</p>
<p><strong>MULTI-PHONE SUPPORT</strong></p>
<p>If you wanted to play an N-Gage game before, you were forced to use a single phone&#8211;the N-Gage. Considering that Nokia alone makes dozens of models, this seriously restricted their available market. Instead of N-Gage existing as a hardware device, it is now a gaming platform that works on any N-Series phone. There are tens of millions of these babies scattered around the world, meaning they&#8217;ve got a fine built-in base.</p>
<p>Of course, while nearly everybody who bought an old N-Gage likely also plopped down for some games, most people with N70s probably don&#8217;t care too much about gaming. Still, Nokia is confident that the sheer mass of units should create a large enough market. &#8220;About 50% of N-Series usesrs are involved in gaming,&#8221; Sauter said. &#8220;As we look at who is buying mobile games today, about 5% of users in general are purchasing games. But if you look at Series 60 users, its 20% percent or more.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>PUBLISHER SUPPORT:</strong></p>
<p>The reason the PS2 kicked GameCube&#8217;s butt may partially have to do with superior hardware, but it also had far better third-party publisher support. The fact is, if any gaming platform is to survive and thrive, it needs publisher support. This is particularly true with Nokia, which lacks the first-party gaming history of Nintendo, which could concievably survive off Mario and Zelda alone.</p>
<p>Nokia&#8217;s got some gaming heavy hitters in their roster of friendly publishers. Guys like  EA, THQ, Gameloft, and Capcom are all on board. Considering that it couldn&#8217;t have been the N-Gage&#8217;s proven track record of commercial success that convinced them, I&#8217;m curious as to how they managed it. Either way&#8211;they did it, and that&#8217;s what matters.</p>
<p><strong>LIBERATION FROM CARTRIDGES</strong></p>
<p>The N-Gage used to use SD card-like cartidges. Considering that an N-Series phone is a 3G, highspeed device, this is a bit antiquated. WIth new N-Gage games, while that cartridge option is still on the table for publishers, most games are now to be downloaded over the air. This will give publishers greater freedom to create both games that were too massive and amazing for tiny cartridges (MMORPGs, for instance), as well as tiny casual games that are likely too cheap to throw on one (<em>Snakes II: The Revenge</em>.)</p>
<p>I also have confirmation that there will be at least one online game that wil feature both PC and N-Gage-based versions that interact in the same world. So play at home, then continue where you left off when you hop on the bus.</p>
<p><strong>COPING WITH BAD BUTTONS</strong></p>
<p>Playing games on most mobiles means juggling tiny buttons that were made for dialing numbers, not shooting bad guys. As gross as the old N-Gage was, its dedicated gaming buttons and controller-like feel made playing a snap. By turning N-Gage into a cross-phone platform, they&#8217;ve lost some of that ease. Still, Nokia is intent on at least partially remedying the situation. According to Sauter, this includes disabling buttons that aren&#8217;t used in the current game you are playing (no more accidentally calling mom when you meant to kick a goal), and integrating touchscreens that will be prominent in future Nokia phones in a Nintendo DS-like fashion.</p>
<p>So will N-Gage the platform succeed where N-Gage the phone failed? That depends. They&#8217;ve got publisher support and are liberated from the one-phone-only jail the platform lived in before, but the secret to its success may be Nokia opening it up to other manufacturers. While this is obviously a possibility, especially considering that more non-Nokia phones are using Symbian these days, I just hope it won&#8217;t take another few years of for them to realize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/the-futurist-the-n-gage-lives-but-can-it-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia Launches Ovi Mobile Platform: Gaming, Maps, Music Umbrella</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-launches-ovi-mobile-platform-gaming-maps-music-umbrella/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-launches-ovi-mobile-platform-gaming-maps-music-umbrella/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-launches-ovi-mobile-platform-gaming-maps-music-umbrella/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Big news here in London. It&#8217;s no secret Nokia&#8217;s moving more into the content providing phase these days: offering mapping services, games, and a music store. In order to keep their scattered offerings under one umbrella, they&#8217;ve announced the upcoming launch of Ovi. A sort of cross-platform portal, Ovi will let users log on from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1371/1266339649_19635f408e.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p>Big news here in London. It&#8217;s no secret Nokia&#8217;s moving more into the content providing phase these days: offering mapping services, games, and a music store. In order to keep their scattered offerings under one umbrella, they&#8217;ve announced the upcoming launch of Ovi. A sort of cross-platform portal, Ovi will let users log on from either their Nokia phone or interneted PC to download their music (to phone or PC), N-Gage (!) games, and nav maps. </p>
<p>Today it&#8217;s mostly just a concept, but it keeps their offerings together, and allows them to easily roll out more content down the line.</p>
<p>And that word Ovi? It&#8217;s Finnish for door. Naturally. </p>
<p><span id="more-12196"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1293/1267003004_be031948a0.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1024/1266184915_74cccd937f.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><small>Photos by Peter Ha</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-launches-ovi-mobile-platform-gaming-maps-music-umbrella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia To Stake N-Gage Mobile Gaming Future On N-Series, Ovi Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-to-stake-n-gage-mobile-gaming-future-on-n-series-ovi-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-to-stake-n-gage-mobile-gaming-future-on-n-series-ovi-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-to-stake-n-gage-mobile-gaming-future-on-n-series-ovi-platform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
N-Gage had some decent games. The main problem with the old platform, of course, was that you had to buy one very specific Choco-Tacoy phone. They only pushed about 3 million of these suckers out the door in the entire world, which meant they were far shy of the terminal velocity needed to create a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28429352@N00/1266161488/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1435/1266161488_14f53cbf08.jpg" width="500" height="332" alt="Ngage"  class="center" /></a></p>
<p>N-Gage had some decent games. The main problem with the old platform, of course, was that you had to buy one very specific Choco-Tacoy phone. They only pushed about 3 million of these suckers out the door in the entire world, which meant they were far shy of the terminal velocity needed to create a profitable gaming ecosystem. Well, there are already tens of millions of N-Series phones scattered throughout the world&#8211;Not a bad place to start out their new platform, eh?  And because some of these N-Series phones have as much as 8-gigs of memory, they are relying on more of a download-and-play style system, rather than the old cartridge-based days of yore. Games will cost from 6 to 10 euros a pop (that&#8217;s 90 to 170 dollars, with current exchange rates), and will be available for daily or weekly rental or totally free demo play.</p>
<p>Remarkably, Nokia has kept the N-Gage Arena online gaming service alive this whole time,  so N-Gage fanatics should be happy for the update.</p>
<p>And, of course, all of this downloading will come through the brand-new<a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-launches-ovi-mobile-platform-gaming-maps-music-umbrella/"> Ovi platform.</a></p>
<p><span id="more-12194"></span></p>
<p>Here are a few of the upcoming titles -Peter Ha</p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1315/1266797666_bbb749eaae.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1184/1265934765_00fa5c6c17.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p>And a list of content providers</p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1193/1266106719_9898b03965.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-to-stake-n-gage-mobile-gaming-future-on-n-series-ovi-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia Intros N81 Multimedia Phone</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-intros-n81-multimedia-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-intros-n81-multimedia-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-intros-n81-8-gig-and-microsd-only-memory-versions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Photos and video by Peter Ha
We love the Nokia N-Series. If you can handle a bulky pocket and don&#8217;t insist on a real keyboard (or multi-touch screen), there really is no better way of of converging everything you&#8217;d ever want to do in your pocket. Enter the N81. It hits in two versions: One&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="center"><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nux9c5ktGoI"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nux9c5ktGoI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></div>
<p><small>Photos and video by Peter Ha</small></p>
<p>We love the Nokia N-Series. If you can handle a bulky pocket and don&#8217;t insist on a real keyboard (or multi-touch screen), there really is no better way of of converging everything you&#8217;d ever want to do in your pocket. Enter the N81. It hits in two versions: One&#8217;s got 8-gig of flash, the other relies on your microSD card. Both have got stereo speakers, killer music format support (MP3, AAC, WMA, etc&#8230;), suppot for N-Gage games (!), an FM reciever, a sweet &#8220;Navi Wheel&#8221;, and play video via RealPlayer. All in all: Very nice! No clue on price, but you can bet it won&#8217;t be cheap (especially since Nokia is a fan of selling non-contract GSM phones, which means no carrier subsidy.)</p>
<p>Nokia chose to introduce us to this sweet sucker using a boy band-style song. Oh, and look for it in Q4. Hands on pics after the jump.<br />
<span id="more-12188"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1312/1265995217_d7d00b584e.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1300/1265984607_e60fe874a9.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1440/1266834958_0341620883.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1420/1265965773_c20478bd18.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1393/1265959127_c9134d5ddf.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-intros-n81-multimedia-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia N-95 Goes Black, 8-Gigs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-n-95-goes-black-8-gigs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-n-95-goes-black-8-gigs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Porges</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-n-95-goes-black-8-gigs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The N-95 gets 8-gigs of memory, and a few (mostly cosmetic) updates today, like a nice black shell, and some other minor body mods. Still, the lack of any real internal innovation shouldn&#8217;t be too troublesome&#8211;the N95 is already a bit ahead of it&#8217;s time, if you ask me, but considering that the original came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1251/1267005796_e3f4ee1d24.jpg" alt=""  class="center" /></p>
<p>The N-95 gets 8-gigs of memory, and a few (mostly cosmetic) updates today, like a nice black shell, and some other minor body mods. Still, the lack of any real internal innovation shouldn&#8217;t be too troublesome&#8211;the N95 is already a bit ahead of it&#8217;s time, if you ask me, but considering that the original came out before the most-hyped phone in history, and their entire reponse at the top-of-the-line appears to be a few gigs and a black coat&#8211;now that&#8217;s a bit worrisome. As I said: The N95 doesn&#8217;t necessarily NEED anything new to be an insanely amazing phone, but a black cover won&#8217;t do much to suck from the hype teet. Of course, the whole media machine is a bit burnt out on phones, so they&#8217;d probably have to throw in some teleporting and wireless power action to really accomplish that. And it hits in Q4.</p>
<p>Oh, and the President of Nokia just said that his favorite album was <em>Signals</em>, by Rush. I love the Finns. I really do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/nokia-n-95-goes-black-8-gigs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
