<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CrunchGear &#187; Sigma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/tag/Sigma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sigma inexplicably releases a minimally changed DP1s</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/02/sigma-inexplicably-releases-a-minimally-changed-dp1s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/02/sigma-inexplicably-releases-a-minimally-changed-dp1s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=115897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_front-560x420.jpg"/>Pop quiz, hot shot: you release a product to <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/">tepid critical response</a>. Despite having a good concept behind it, it's slow, limited, and performs badly in low light. After a year and a half, you release its <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/">sequel</a>, which is better but still <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp2/">not really that good</a>. <em>What do you do?</em>

A) Forget this approach, try something new like Micro Four-Thirds
B) Get a decent lens on that thing and improve responsiveness
C) Tell her that you want her love
D) Release a new version of the <em>old </em>product with such changes as it would take an expert in these things to see the difference. Delude yourself into thinking these minor shortcomings were the reason your product was received so poorly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="center"><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_front-560x420.jpg"/></div>
<p>Pop quiz, hot shot: you release a product to <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/">tepid critical response</a>. Despite having a good concept behind it, it&#8217;s slow, limited, and performs badly in low light. After a year and a half, you release its <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/">sequel</a>, which is better but still <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp2/">not really that good</a>. <em>What do you do?</em></p>
<p>A) Forget this approach, try something new like Micro Four-Thirds<br />
B) Get a decent lens on that thing and improve responsiveness<br />
C) Tell her that you want her love<br />
D) Release a new version of the <em>old </em>product with such changes as it would take an expert in these things to see the difference. Delude yourself into thinking these minor shortcomings were the reason your product was received so poorly.</p>
<p>If you chose D, <a href="http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Sigma_upgrades_DP1s_APSC_sensor_compact_camera_news_290094.html">you&#8217;re Sigma</a>!</p>
<p>Seriously, the DP1 was never a great camera, and the DP2 was a minor update. And now they come out with this DP1s? It&#8217;s like Microsoft coming out with Vista (plus DirectX 11) after Windows 7 comes out. What an utterly inexplicable move this is!</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://photorumors.com/2009/10/02/sigma-dp1s-released/">Photo Rumors</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/02/sigma-inexplicably-releases-a-minimally-changed-dp1s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigma&#8217;s DP2 approaches release; pics and specs updated</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pma 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=76187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/headline.jpg" />We've been aware of the <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/">DP2 </a>for some time, and although its predecessor was <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/">coolly </a><a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/24/the-sigma-dp1-is-a-technical-marvel-but-thats-about-it/">received</a>, I'm excited about this one. Everyone agreed that the DP1 was a technical accomplishment, but its actual performance was lacking. AF, shutter lag, speed in general was an issue, poor low light performance &#8212; the list goes on, even more so than I remember. But if Sigma has made the changes that need to happen, this could be a very impressive camera.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/headline.jpg" alt="headline" title="headline" width="620" height="354" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-76190" /><br />
We&#8217;ve been aware of the <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/">DP2 </a>for some time, and although its predecessor was <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/">coolly </a><a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/24/the-sigma-dp1-is-a-technical-marvel-but-thats-about-it/">received</a>, I&#8217;m excited about this one. Everyone agreed that the DP1 was a technical accomplishment, but its actual performance was lacking. AF, shutter lag, speed in general was an issue, poor low light performance &mdash; the list goes on, even more so than I remember. But if Sigma has made the changes that need to happen, this could be a very impressive camera.</p>
<p><div>
	<h2>
		<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/">Sigma DP2 (PMA 2009)</a>
	</h2>
	<p>
			<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/image-page/1" rel="nofollow" title="DP2PMA_1_L"><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/picturesurf/Sigma_DP2_(PMA_2009)_127/ST_27l9diy50t5q.JPG" style="margin:2px 0; border:1px solid #BDC7D8"/></a>
			<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/image-page/2" rel="nofollow" title="DP2PMA_2_L"><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/picturesurf/Sigma_DP2_(PMA_2009)_127/ST_27labi5whwcj.JPG" style="margin:2px 0; border:1px solid #BDC7D8"/></a>
			<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/image-page/3" rel="nofollow" title="DP2PMA_3_L"><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/picturesurf/Sigma_DP2_(PMA_2009)_127/ST_27lbnltp2wkt.JPG" style="margin:2px 0; border:1px solid #BDC7D8"/></a>
			<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/image-page/4" rel="nofollow" title="DP2PMA_4_L"><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/picturesurf/Sigma_DP2_(PMA_2009)_127/ST_27lcicm72cjo.JPG" style="margin:2px 0; border:1px solid #BDC7D8"/></a>
		</p>
</div></p>
<p>But the more <a href="http://www.sigma-dp.com/DP2/main.html">I look at the specs</a>, the more it looks the same. It uses a similar sensor (after <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/11/sigma-buys-out-sensor-maker-foveon/">buying out Foveon</a> they may have appropriated some of their improved tech), a similar fixed lens (though significantly faster &mdash; f/2.8 vs. f/4), and the body looks almost completely unchanged. The button configuration has been switched around somewhat, but that&#8217;s about it, and the LCD screen (which was reviled in reviews) doesn&#8217;t seem to have changed either. You can focus a little closer (11 inches) but that&#8217;s not saying much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really hoping this camera turns out to be a better piece of kit than the DP1, but unless a lot of the changes are unadvertised, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be surpassing it by much. Still, we&#8217;ll do what we can to review it and cover what the rest of the world says about this interesting camera.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1236050085.html">Imaging Resource</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/03/03/sigmas-dp2-approaches-release-pics-and-specs-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigma buys out sensor maker Foveon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/11/sigma-buys-out-sensor-maker-foveon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/11/sigma-buys-out-sensor-maker-foveon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dSLRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foveon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=53211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sigma has been using Foveon sensors in its cameras for a couple years now, although some questioned the efficacy of said sensor in their ambitious but disappointing DP1. (Good explanation of the Foveon sensor here). Apparently, though, Sigma is confident enough in the technology that they&#8217;re willing to buy Foveon lock, stock, and barrel. Maybe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_front-560x420.jpg" class="none"><br />
<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/tag/Sigma/">Sigma </a>has been using Foveon sensors in its cameras for a couple years now, although some questioned the efficacy of said sensor in their <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/24/the-sigma-dp1-is-a-technical-marvel-but-thats-about-it/">ambitious but disappointing DP1</a>. (Good explanation of the Foveon sensor <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/">here</a>). Apparently, though, Sigma is confident enough in the technology that they&#8217;re willing to<a href="http://www.sigmaphoto.com/news/news.asp?nID=3457"> buy Foveon lock, stock, and barrel</a>. Maybe they know something we don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>What does this mean for you? Well, it means that they&#8217;re going to keep on plugging away with their current strategy, and hopefully the <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/">DP2</a> will be a real player. I was rooting for them; it must be difficult to be a third party in the DSLR business. Nobody knows when the DP2 is due, but I&#8217;m looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/11/sigma-buys-out-sensor-maker-foveon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigma unveils new compact camera, the DP2</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Serkan Toto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cgjapan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photokina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=43851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sigma Japan today unveiled the Sigma DP2 [JP], the successor model to the DP1, which was released earlier this year and received lukewarm reviews. As of now, there is no word of the new camera on Sigma&#8217;s American web site.
The Sigma DP2 features a 3-layer 14 megapixel Foveon X3 sensor (2,652×1,768) with an updated True [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_front.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-43856 aligncenter" title="sigma_dp2_front" src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_front-560x420.jpg" alt="" width="560" height="420" /></a>Sigma Japan today <a href="http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/news/080923_dp2.htm">unveiled the Sigma DP2</a> [JP], the successor model to the DP1, which was released earlier this year and <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/search/sigma+dp1">received lukewarm reviews</a>. As of now, there is no word of the new camera on <a href="http://www.sigma-photo.com">Sigma&#8217;s American web site</a>.</p>
<p>The Sigma DP2 features a 3-layer 14 megapixel Foveon X3 sensor (2,652×1,768) with an updated True (&#8221;Three-layer Responsive Ultimate Engine&#8221;) image processor to enhance image quality and boost processing speed.</p>
<p>Sigma also equipped the DP2 with a new 24.2mm F2.8 lens (equivalent to 41mm on a 35mm SLR camera). The camera comes with a 2.5-inch LCD display and is sized at 113.3×54.6×59.5mm (4.3mm thinner than the DP1).</p>
<p>Sigma will present the camera to the general public during the <a href="http://www.photokina-cologne.com/">Photokina 2008</a>, a trade show that starts today in Cologne/Germany. There is no word yet from the company regarding price or release date (not even for the Japanese market).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_back.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-43857" title="sigma_dp2_back" src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sigma_dp2_back-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/23/sigma-unveils-new-compact-camera-the-dp2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sigma DP1 is a technical marvel, but that&#8217;s about it</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/24/the-sigma-dp1-is-a-technical-marvel-but-thats-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/24/the-sigma-dp1-is-a-technical-marvel-but-thats-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Deleon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=30925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One month and change after DP Review gave the Sigma DP1 a so-so review, David Pogue now offers his two cents. Like DP Review, Pogue likes the SLR-in-a-point-and-shoot&#8217;s body, but says it&#8217;s not the end-all, be-all for the concept.
The Sigma DP1, in case you don&#8217;t remember, essentially puts an SLR sensor inside a point-and-shoot&#8217;s body, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/?pp_album=main&amp;pp_cat=default&amp;pp_image=sigmadp1.jpg" title="sigmadp1"><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/photos/sigmadp1.jpg" alt="sigmadp1" width="560" height="430" class="center" /></a></p>
<p>One month and change after <A HREF="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/">DP Review</A> gave the Sigma DP1 a so-so review, David Pogue now <A HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/technology/personaltech/24pogue.html?pagewanted=1&#038;8dpc&#038;_r=1">offers his two cents</A>. Like DP Review, Pogue likes the SLR-in-a-point-and-shoot&#8217;s body, but says it&#8217;s not the end-all, be-all for the concept.</p>
<p>The Sigma DP1, in case you don&#8217;t remember, essentially puts an SLR sensor inside a point-and-shoot&#8217;s body, to mixed results. </p>
<p>While Pogue admits that the camera is a technical marvel, it doesn&#8217;t deliver as well as we might like. The lens doesn&#8217;t zoom; it&#8217;s too slow for proper action shots; the RAW files don&#8217;t work with PhotoShop; there&#8217;s no viewfinder, and the LCD washes out easily; and there&#8217;s no lens cap, for Pete&#8217;s sake. </p>
<p>Best advice: tread lightly with this one.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/24/the-sigma-dp1-is-a-technical-marvel-but-thats-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigma&#8217;s DP1 hits: hybrid point-and-shoot/DSLR ruled interesting but lacking</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dp1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point and shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
DPReview has one of their signature extremely long and in-depth reviews that I love up for the Sigma DP1. I remember hearing about this thing some time ago, but apparently technical issues kept it from release until just recently. Well, now it&#8217;s been thoroughly evaluated, and the verdict is: great idea, but lacking polish and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/dp1_4view.jpg" alt="sorry for modding your photo DPReview" title="dp1_4view" width="560" height="430" class="center" /><br />
DPReview has one of their signature <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/">extremely long and in-depth reviews that I love up for the Sigma DP1</a>. I remember hearing about this thing some time ago, but apparently technical issues kept it from release until just recently. Well, now it&#8217;s been thoroughly evaluated, and the verdict is: great idea, but lacking polish and adequate image quality in many circumstances.</p>
<p>The thing about the DP1 is that it has a big ol&#8217; DSLR-sized sensor and a lot of the benefits that come with it (increased resolution, better image quality, RAW capture), but keeps the small form factor of the point-and-shoot. However, it lacks many of the consumer-friendly features of modern point-and-shoots, and has only a (serviceable, but still) 28mm prime lens, which limits one&#8217;s framing options somewhat. DPReview found that in good conditions it was fantastic, but in low light and action it was a poor performer. There&#8217;s more (lots more) in the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmadp1/">review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/19/sigmas-dp1-hits-hybrid-point-and-shootdslr-ruled-interesting-but-lacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigma SD14 Sneak Peek</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/08/29/sigma-sd14-sneak-peek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/08/29/sigma-sd14-sneak-peek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/08/29/sigma-sd14-sneak-peek/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sigma is a well-known high-end camerawell-known third party lens company and they appear to be teasing us with a pre-Photokina website tells little about the product but definitely generates a bit of excitement.
It seems this new camera will have a Foveon image sensor and some new ways of processing RAW image data. Other than that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k90/crunchgear/sigma.gif" class="center"></p>
<p>Sigma is a <s>well-known high-end camera</s>well-known third party lens company and they appear to be teasing us with a <A HREF="http://www.koelnmesse.de/wEnglisch/photokina/">pre-Photokina</A> website tells little about the product but definitely generates a bit of excitement.</p>
<p>It seems this new camera will have a Foveon image sensor and some new ways of processing RAW image data. Other than that scant information, we&#8217;re going to have to wait until September 26 when they&#8217;ll launch the thing officially.</p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.sigma-sd14.com/">Product Page</A> [Sigma via <A HREF="http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/9881/sigma_sd14/">LetsGoDigital]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/08/29/sigma-sd14-sneak-peek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
